Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,275 Results

1. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:- “10[A] be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order and/or directions in the nature of mandamus quashing and setting aside the order of detention passed by the respondent no.2 under Section 129(1) of the GST Act of the goods and conveyance bearing Truck No.GJ-27-X-3908 at Bakrol Chowkdi at about 10:45 a.m. on 19.05.2019...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TAX BAR ASSOCIATION vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Rajasthan High Court | Feb 5, 2020)

Order The name of Shri Sanjay Jhanwar as learned counsel for the petitioner be read in the earlier order passed by this Court today in the morning. Learned counsel for the petitioner was directed to implead the service provider, who operates the GSTN portal, as party respondent. The name and address of the service provider shall be provided by the learned counsel for the Union of India. The present petition has been filed by the Tax Bar Association raising the issue about non-func...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

INTERNATIONAL FLOWER AUCTION BANGALORE LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Feb 5, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 101 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the KGST Act, 2017) 1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST, Act 2017 and SGST, Act 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean reference to the corresponding similar provisions in the ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MUSASHI AUTO PARTS INDIA PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Haryana | Feb 4, 2020)

1. Brief facts: 1.1 The applicant is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956/2013 and is engaged in the business of manufacturing and supply of Auto Parts. The Applicant is a registered person with GSTIN 06AABCE4079P1Z7 and discharges the tax liability as per the provisions of Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'CGST Act') (hereinafter collectively referred to as '...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. MANIPAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Feb 4, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS Under Section 101 of the CGST Act 2017 and the KGST Act 2017 1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST, Act 2017 and SGST, Act 2017 are in pari matenia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean reference to the corresponding similar provisions in the...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The prayers in the above W.P.(C.) are as follows : (i) “call for the records leading to Exhibits P2, P3, P4 and P5 issued by the 2nd respondent, and quash the same by the issuance of a writ of certiorari or such other order or direction. (ii) Declare that action of the 2nd respondent in continuing with the detention of the vehicle of the petitioner and goods carried therein, consignment value per invoice of which, is below ₹ 50,000/- as being illegal, arbitrary, unfair, unreas...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The prayers in the above writ petition civil are as follows: (a) Issue a writ of certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of this case, calling for the records leading to the issue of Ext.P5 order and Ext.P5(a) notice and after scrutinizing the same, to strike down and quash them: (b) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, orders or directions directing the 1st respondent to refrain f...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NATHALAL MAGANLAL CHAUHAN vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Feb 4, 2020)

JUDGMENT ( Per : Honourable Mr. Justice J. B. Pardiwala ) 1. RULE returnable forthwith. Mr.Vinay Vishen and Mr.Chintan Dave, the learned AGP waive service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the State respondents. 2. Since the issues raised in both the writ-applications are the same, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order. 3. For the sake of convenience, the Special Civil Application No.513 of 2020 is treated as the lead mat...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R 1. The two notifications Notification 8/2017 - Integrated Tax (Rate), issued on 28.06.2017 and Entry 10 of the Notification 10/2017 Integrated Tax (Rate) also dated 28.06.2017, in respect whereof the present challenge is raised have been quashed by the Gujarat High Court vide its judgment rendered in Mohit Minerals v. Union of India reported as (2020) 113 taxmann.com 436 (Gujarat). Learned counsel for the Respondents seeks an adjournment to take instructions whether th...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
All India Federation of Tax Practitioners, Registered Office at 215, Rewa Chambers, 31, New Marine Lines, Mumbai 400020 and its eastern office at Kolkata, West Bengal covering all the North Eastern States and represented by Shri Pritam Baruah, Vice Chairman (East Zone) of the Federation AND Tax Bar Association, Guwahati, Shree Ram Market, 2nd Floor, Chatribari, Guwahati– 781001, represented by Shri Amit Pareek, Secretary of the Association, have preferred this petition in Public In...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


22
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).