Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,275 Results

The facts set up in this W.P.(C.) are as follows : That the petitioner is an importer and exporter. The petitioner purchased imported raw cashew from MAC world Industries RHD-3-11 Block B, Philed Damansara, Malaysia. Vide Ext.P1 has paid IGST of ₹ 630769/- It is submitted that the original importer was M/s. St.Mary's Cashew Factory, Puthoor, Kollam. The goods were transported to Ernakulam at the Branch Officer of the petitioner concerned. While so, the dealer called M/s. St.Mary'...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OWP No.2560/2018 1. The writ petition has been filed submitting that a consignment of nuts and bolts was purchased by the petitioner’s firm from Shree Ambey Metal Industries Ltd., Ludhiana through bill No.719 dated 30th November, 2018. Another consignment was purchased by the SGF Infra Private Ltd., on the 13th November, 2018 itself from Jatinder Enterprises, Ludhiana. We may note that the petitioner has placed on record only the bill relating to the purchase effected from SGF Infra...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SANDEEP GOYAL S/O SH. SATPAL GOYAL vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Rajasthan High Court | Feb 5, 2020)

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail in F.I.R. No.15/2018, registered at Police Station DGGI, GST, Jaipur, Rajasthan for offence under Sections 132(1)(b)(c)(d)(f)(i) and (i) read with Section Sub-section 5 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that earlier bail petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed as bail petition filed by co-accused Himani Munjal had ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The short grievance of the petitioners is against the alleged deduction of GST instead of VAT as per the stipulations contained in Tender Notification; this grievance is founded on a legal premise that the GST becomes payable with effect from 1.7.2017 and till then, what was leviable was VAT only, the rate of former being little higher than that of the latter. 2. After service of notice, the respondents having entered appearance through their Panel Counsel, resist the Writ Petit...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The case set up in W.P.(C.) No.2985/2020 is as follows : That the petitioner is an assessee to GST on the rolls of the 1st respondent herein. On account of severe financial crisis, petitioner has defaulted filing of return from November, 2018. Now, the 1st respondent has issued Ext.P1 order of assessment under Sec.62 of the Act fixing the tax liability at exorbitant figures. But the said order does not comply with the yardsticks prescribed under Sec.62 of the Act. Further, the petitioner ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

R. KAVITHA vs. THE ASST. STATE TAX OFFICER


(Kerala High Court | Feb 5, 2020)

The facts set up in the W.P.(C.) are as follows : That the petitioner is engaged in transportation of heavy commodities using trailers. The petitioner had transported plate metal plats from Chattisgarh to Calicut by a trailer bearing registration No. as per Ext.P1 along with Ext.P3 e-way bill. The said vehicle along with goods is detained by the 1st respondent herein under Sec.129(1) of the CGST Act demanding payment of tax and penalty. The only reason for detention is that the vehicle nu...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner firm seeking a direction to the respondents to release the goods along with vehicle intercepted on 9/12/2019 under Rajasthan Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 (‘RGST Act’) and has sought inquiry by an independent agency against the role of respondent no. 4 on account of his having exercised the powers in an illegal and arbitrary manner. It is inter alia indicated in the writ petition that the petitioner is...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “8(a) To quash and set aside the impugned notice issued by the Respondent No.2 dated 14.05.2019 u/s.130 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. (b) To hold and declare that the impugned notice u/s.130 issued by the Respondent No.2 as illegal, and contrary to the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. (c) In the mea...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By way of this Writ-Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) To issue a Writ of Mandamus and/or Writ of Certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, to quash and set aside the Notice for confection in form MOV-10 issued the respondent no.2 on such terms and conditions which may be deemed fit and proper to this Hon’ble Court and in the interest of the petitioner. In alte...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:- “29[A] be pleased to admit and allow this writ petition. [B] be pleased to issue writ of mandamus, Quo Warranto, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned notice dated 30-5-2019 as being illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and unconstitutional. [C] be pleased to direct the release of goods s...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


22
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).