Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,262 Results

M/S. PANBASE RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Feb 25, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. PANBASE RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the follow...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

LATEST DEVELOPERS ADVISORY LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Feb 25, 2020)

Note: Any appeal against the advance ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pro...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Feb 25, 2020)

Note: Any appeal against the Advance Ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pro...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Regard being had to the similitude of the issue involved in the present cases. They are being decided by this common order. For the sake of convenience, the facts are noted from W.P. No.462/2020 (M/s Navaakar Real Estates vs. Union of India and others). 2. These are the writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent No.3/Joint Commissioner cum Appellate Authority for State Goods and Service Tax, Bhopal by which he ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAJESH AND ANOTHER, MANISH, SATNARAIN vs. STATE OF HARYANA


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Feb 25, 2020)

1. This order shall dispose of the above mentioned three petitions filed on behalf of Rajesh, Inder Partap Singh, Manish and Satnarain seeking grant of regular bail in a case registered against them vide FIR No.571 dated 4.6.2019 under Sections 419/420/467/468/471/120-B/259 IPC registered at Police Station Chandni Bagh, District Panipat. 2. The FIR in question was lodged at the instance of ASI Vinod Kumar wherein it has been alleged that on 4.6.2019 when he along with other police officia...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present writ petition has been filed questioning the investigation initiated by the respondents and the summons issued in connection with the said investigation. The primary challenge to the investigation and the summons issued was a specific bar under the GST Act, 2017. 2. It would be relevant at this juncture to take note of the relief sought for by the petitioner: “10.1 It is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in nature of Quo Warr...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that after the goods were intercepted on 6.12.2019, the petitioner approached the authorities with an intention to get the goods and the vehicle released after the payment of tax as was payable under Section 129(1)(a) of the GST Act. However, when the tax as was being paid by the petitioner was not accepted and imposition of tax was being done under Section 129 (1)(b) of the Act, an Appeal under Section 107 (1) of the Act was filed. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHRI PARAMJEET RATHEE vs. M/S. SUPERTECH LIMITED


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Feb 25, 2020)

ORDER 1. The present Report dated 30.08.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed an application dated 03.07.2018 (Annexure-I) before the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering under Rule 128 of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 201...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. DKV ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Feb 24, 2020)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/S DKV Enterprises Private Limited, (hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods & Services ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. SHILPA MEDICARE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Feb 24, 2020)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/s Shilpa Medicare Limited.,(hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods & Services Tax...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


20
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).