Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,262 Results

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr. Chintan Dave, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order and/or directions in the nature of mandamus quashing and setting aside th...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Mr.Ankit Shah, the learned standing counsel appearing for the Union of India and Mr. Chintan Dave, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the State jointly make a statement that the issue will be resolved without fail by next date of hearing. 2. We do not see any good reason why this issue should not be resolved. 3. Post this matter on 26.02.2020 on top of the board. 4. We hope that, we are not constrained on the next date of hearing to pass a harsh order. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr. Soham Joshi, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order and/or directions in the nature of mandamus quashing and setting aside the...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SYNERGY FERTICHEM PVT. LTD vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Feb 19, 2020)

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr. Soham Joshi, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. For the sake of convenience, we treat the Special Civil Application No.4730 of 2019 as the lead matter. 3. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicants have prayed for the following reliefs; “(A) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a w...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr. Dave, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order and/or directions in the nature of mandamus quashing and setting aside the order ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAJENDRAN SANTHOSH


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Feb 18, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 101 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the KGST Act, 2017) 1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST, Act 2017 and SGST, Act 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean reference to the corresponding similar provisions in the ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this petition the petitioner has made the following prayer:- a. Impugned order dated 07.06.2019 be set aside/quashed by issuing writ of certiorari; b. Respondent be directed by issuance of writ of Mandamus to supply certified copies of documents seized by them during search dated 09.07.2018 at Head Office as well as godown and Respondent be further directed not to ask information from petitioner which is not in their possession and collect them from the seized papers which is al...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with an offence registered vide F.No.IV/1625/ PI/Zikshoo/ Impex/201920/ Gr.VI issued by Inspector of CGST & CE, Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax, Gandhinagar for the offence punishable under Section 132(1)(b) of CGST Act, 2017. 2. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applica...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KRISHNA GROUP vs. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Feb 18, 2020)

ORDER Upon an interception, the petitioner's goods under Section 129 were siezed and the proceedings culminated in an order dated 25.9.2018. This was an order passed under Section 129 (3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Thereafter the petitioner was free to do his trading as prior to the passing of the order the goods and the vehicle had already been released. After the goods were seized after interception on 15.9.2018, for getting the goods released, t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sunil Mishra, learned counsel for the State, GST authorities. Pursuant to the show cause notice issued by the GST authorities, the petitioner supplied all the documents and on consideration of the same vide order dated 27.03.2019, Registration Certificate of the petitioner was cancelled. The petitioner should have filed appeal before the competent authority within a period of three months or at best within a period of four months, as there ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


21
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).