Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,262 Results

ORDER The subject matter of challenge in the instant writ proceedings is a detention order dated 11th September, 2019, issued by the Assistant Commissioner (Mobile Squad)-2, Kanpur. The records reveal that after the detention order was issued on 11th September, 2019, it was followed up by a show cause notice which was issued on the same date. The show cause notice was addressed to the petitioner. The said notice was duly served under section 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Servi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SH. DEEPAK KUMAR BARNWAL vs. M/S. MANAS VIHAR SAHAKARI AWAS SAMITI LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Feb 27, 2020)

ORDER 1. The present Report dated 30.08.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No.1 had filed application dated 05.09.2018 (Annexure-1) before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering stating that the Respondent had resorted to profiteering in respect of supply...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This Report dated 12.09.2019 and the supplementary Report dated 25.11.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, an Application was filed by the Applicant No.1 before the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GULF OIL LUBRICANTS INDIA LTD. vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Feb 26, 2020)

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr.Chintan Dave, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: A. This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the learned Respondents to forthwith release...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs : “6. The petitioner accordingly prays that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue: a. A writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order and/or directions in the nature of mandamus to quash and setting aside the notice issue by the respondent no.2 for confiscation of goods or conveyances and levy of penalty under Section 130 of...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DHARMA LUBES PVT. LTD. vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Feb 26, 2020)

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr. Chintan Dave, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: A. This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the learned Respondents to forthwith releas...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TOPLINE SWITCHGEAR PVT. LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Feb 26, 2020)

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Nirzar Desai, the learned counsel waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents nos.1 and 2. Mr. Soaham Joshi, the learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents nos.3, 4 and 5. 2. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for the following reliefs: “25(A) be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus directing the learned Respondents to act o...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GALLOPS INFRASTRUCTURE LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Feb 26, 2020)

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Nirzar Desai, the learned counsel waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents nos.1 and 4. Mr. Soaham Joshi, the learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents nos.2 and 3. 2. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for the following reliefs:- “24(A) be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus directing the learned Respondents to act on ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SAWARIYA TRADERS vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Feb 26, 2020)

1. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the writ-applicants have prayed for the following reliefs : “(a) Certiorari quashing the Mov-10 (Notice for confiscation dated 23.09.2019 (Annexure D to the writ petition) (b) Certiorari quashing the Circular Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST, dated April 13, 2018 (c) Mandamus directing the respondent no.3 to forthwith release the goods and vehicle without demanding any security. (d) Issue any other wri...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAJ CHAMUNDA ROADLINES vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Feb 26, 2020)

1. By this Writ-Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “A. This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order and/or directions in the nature of mandamus quashing and setting aside the notice issued by the respondent No.2 dated 28.09.2019 for confiscation of goods or conveyance and levy of penalty under Section 130 of the GST Act as well as the order o...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


20
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).