Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


2
TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option
Active Filters:
Court - HC ✔
Bombay High Court ✔

  455 Results

P.C. 1. The above Writ Petition inter alia challenges the Order dated 1st February 2025 to the extent it has been issued to the Petitioners. By the impugned Order, a penalty of approx. Rs.133 crores has been demanded from the three Petitioners before us. Petitioner No.1 is the Chief Financial Officer of M/s. Shemaroo Entertainment Limited, Petitioner No. 2 is the Chief Executive Officer and Director of the said M/s. Shemaroo Entertainment Limited and Petitioner No. 3 is the Joint Managing...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHYAM UDYOG vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Bombay High Court | Apr 16, 2025)

P. C. 1. The above Writ Petition has been placed on board seeking certain amendments as per the draft amendment tendered to the Court. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and pursuing the amendment sought, we find that the amendments are sought at the preadmission stage and therefore, there can be no impediment in allowing the amendment. This is more so because the nature of the Petition does not change in any way by allowing the aforesaid amendment. In these circumstances, t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT: (PER M. S. KARNIK, J.) 1. This petition by the Goa University under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges a show cause notice dated 05.08.2024 issued by respondent no. 1 – Joint Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST), Goa Commissionerate, proposing to demand GST on the educational activities of the petitioner University. During the pendency of the petition and after the matter was heard, the respondent no. 1 heard the show cause notice and p...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P. C. 1. The above Writ Petition is filed seeking a declaration that the development rights under a revenue sharing arrangement are not a “supply” of services, leivable to GST under Section 7 read with Section 9 of the CGST Act and the transfer and development rights as “sale of land” are beyond the scheme of taxation under the GST Laws in terms of Articles 246 and 246A of the Constitution and under Section 7 read with Section 9 and Schedule III of the CGST Act. Th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P. C. 1. Mentioned. Taken out of turn. Rule. Respondents waive service. With the consent of parties, Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally. 2. The Petitioner has challenged the Order in Original No. Raigad/ADC/44/(SS)24-25 dated 30.08.2024 (“Impugned Order”) issued under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“CGST Act”) and relating to Financial Year 2019-2020. 3. The primary ground for challenging the Im...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. On 11.12.2024, while issuing notice we have recorded the following position. “1. Heard Mr. A.A. Naik, Senior Advocate for the petitioner. 2. The petition questions the notice dated 24.7.2024 (Page 120), by which the petitioner has been asked to pay the amount of tax as ascertained upon the transaction as contemplated by the agreement of sale dated 7.1.2022 under the terms of which the petitioner has been appointed as a developer by the owner, to develop the land of Plot No.2 ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P. C. 1. Mentioned. Taken out of turn by consent learned advocates of the parties. Heard the learned advocates for the parties. 2. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith at the request of and with consent of Parties. 3. The Writ Petition assails the Order-in-Original No.-NSK/CGST-ST/COM/049/2023-24 dated 07.03.2024 (“impugned order”) arising out of Show Cause Notice No F No V(ST)15-199/Commr. Adj/ B G Choudhary/2021-2022/1127 Nasik dated 20.04.2021, passed by Responde...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P. C. 1. Rule. Respondents waive service. The Rule is made returnable immediately at the request of and with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties and heard finally. 2. This Petition challenges the Order-in-Appeal No.SK/395/Appeals-II/ME/2023-24 dated 18th April 2024 read with Rectification Rejection Order dated 24th October 2024 by which the Petitioner’s Appeal before the Respondent No. 1 was dismissed on the ground that the same was instituted beyond three months ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P. C. 1. Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board. 2. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. At the request of and with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, heard finally. 3. The Petition challenges the Order-in-Appeal No. SK/90/ Appeals-II/MC/2024-25 dated 21.06.2024 by which the Petitioner's Appeal before Respondent No. 2 was dismissed on the ground that the Petitioner did not produce documents to establish that the person signing the appeal is the authorised...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P. C. 1. Although the above Writ Petition is shown under the caption “For Ad-Interim Reliefs”, with the consent of parties, we have heard it finally. Hence, we issue Rule. The Respondents waive service. With the consent of parties, Rule is made returnable forthwith and heard finally. 2. The Petitioner had filed the above Writ Petition challenging the Refund Rejection Order dated 01.06.2023 passed by Respondent No. 2 and a direction to Respondent No. 2 to forthwith grant re...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)