Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

LOGSKIM SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Feb 6, 2025)

1. Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-Section (1) of Section 100 of CGST Act 2017/ TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed, is communicated. 2. In terms of Section 103 (1) of the Act, Advance Ruling pronounced by the Authority under Chapter XVII of the Act shall be binding only- (a) on the applicant who had sought it in respect of any...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KANISHK STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Feb 6, 2025)

1. Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai as under Sub-Section (1) of Section 100 of CGST Act / TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed is communicated. 2. In terms of Section 103(1) of the Act, Advance Ruling pronounced by the Authority under Chapter XVII of the Act shall be binding only- (a) on the applicant who had sought it in respect of any matter r...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to call for the records in the impugned order No.RC No.493/2024/A2 passed by the 1st respondent on 19.11.2024 and quash the same; consequently to condone the delay in the case of appeal filed through online. 2. Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader(Taxes) takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage i...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER 1. The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for regular bail in connection with F.I.R. No.11208055240280 of 2024 registered with DCB Police Station, District Rajkot for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2. Learned advocate Mr. A. J. Yagnik appearing for the applicant has submitted that the offence alleged in the F.I.R. had taken place between 01.06.2023 to 30.09.2023 for which the F.I.R. has been lo...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Affidavit of service filed today is kept with the record. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order dated 18th September, 2024, passed by the appellate authority under Section 107 of the Central/West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”), whereby the petitioner’s appeal had been rejected on the ground that the same was barred by limitation. The facts are not in dispute. In connectio...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SATYENDRA NATH BISWAS vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & OTHERS


(Chhattisgarh High Court | Feb 6, 2025)

ORDER PER 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction quashing the impugned order dated 16.04.2024 passed by respondent No. 3. 10.2 That, to direct the respondents to reconsider the case of the petitioner after granting opportunity of hearing. 10.3 Hold that the services provided by the petitioner...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sri Rajesh Tiwari, learned A.C.S.C. for the State. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of Demand Order dated 02.12.2023 and Show Cause Notice dated 29.09.2023 issued consequent to it by the concerned opposite party under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. The contention of counsel for the petitioner is that the notices are time bound. He relies u...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT EASWARAN S., J. This intra-court appeal is preferred by the State aggrieved by the judgment dated 22.11.2024 of the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.40226/2024. 2. The brief facts for the disposal of the appeal are as follows: The 1st respondent herein (assessee), approached the writ court by filing the writ petition challenging Ext.P1 show cause notice issued under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 26.07.2024 passed by the respondent. 2. Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had filed an appeal against the order-in-original dated 26.07.2024 before the respondent. Howe...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The Court made the following Order: The petitioner having suffered an order of assessment, dated 10.02.2023, had filed an appeal before the 1st respondent, on 06.07.2023. This appeal was rejected on the ground of limitation as the appeal should have been filed by 10.05.2023 whereas the appeal had been filed with a delay of 26 days which cannot be condoned as the appellate authority does not have power to condone the said delay. 2. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)