Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,988 Results

Petitioners, 2 in numbers, Managing Director and Director of Kerala Communicators Cable Ltd., through the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has approached this Court with the following prayers: “i. Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Exhibit P2 as illegal and unauthorized. ii. Issue a direction to refund with interest to the petitioners Rupees One Crore collected by the Respondent ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S BR INDUSTRIES vs. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jun 26, 2020)

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Manish Goyal, learned Additional Advocate General, assisted by Sri B.P. Singh Kachhawah, learned Standing counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The petitioner herein seeks to challenge the order dated 17.01.2020 which is consequential to the seizure order dated 31.08.2018. It is admitted that the order dated 31.08.2018 is the subject matter of challenge in Writ Tax No.1298 of 2018, which is pending consideration. We do not find any reaso...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHAHZAD ALAM vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Jun 26, 2020)

Heard Sri Vidya Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, and Sri Rishi Chaddha, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. This anticipatory bail application (under section 438 Cr.P.C.) has been moved seeking bail in Case Crime No. 350 of 2020 under sections 420, 424, 467, 468, 120B IPC and section 122/132 U.P. Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, Police Station Sihani Gate, District Ghaziabad , during the pendency of the investigation. Submission made by the learned co...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHRI M. SRINIVAS vs. M/S. VIJETHA SUPERMARKETS PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jun 26, 2020)

1 The present Report dated 23.12.2019, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed an application alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of the product “Frozen Green Peas” supplied by him. The Applicant had alleged that the Respondent had not r...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SMT. HONEY MACKER vs. M/S. PIVOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jun 26, 2020)

1. The present Report dated 27.12.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that vide her application dated 03.08.2018 filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Applicant No. 1 had alleged profiteering by the Respondent in respect of purch...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JEWEL CLASSIC HOTELS PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Haryana | Jun 25, 2020)

1. Brief submission of the applicant: 1.1 The applicant is running three separate units at three separate locations, having separate management in following names:- a. Hotel Jewels: Hotel Jewels has the facility of short-term hotel accommodation with 54 rooms all with tariff below ₹ 7,500/- (Rupees Seven Thousand Five Hundred per day per unit), banquet facilities, restaurant services, Bar, outdoor catering, etc. This hotel is located at Kunjpura Road, Karnal. b. Hotel ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

WILHELM FRICKE SE


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Haryana | Jun 25, 2020)

1.1 Wilhelm Fricke SE (hereinafter referred to as ‘WFSE India’ or ‘LO’ or ‘applicant’) having presence in India as a liaison office of Wilhelm Fricke SE, based in Germany (hereinafter referred to as ‘WFSE’ or ‘WFSE HO’). WFSE is incorporated in Germany and is, inter alia, engaged in development; assembly/production and sale of agricultural machinery and agricultural machinery spare parts. 1.2 WFSE India is established as a Liaiso...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

OM PARKASH CONTRACTOR


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Haryana | Jun 25, 2020)

1.1 Brief facts of the case: 1.1 As per the details & facts submitted to our office in the application, Om Parkash Contractor, is registered under the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with the provisions of the Haryana State Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 (hereinafter known as the "Assessee/Applicant). 1.2 That the applicant is a civil contractor engaged in executing government works which include construction of civil structure, repa...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SH. PUNEET BANSAL & MS. VANITA BANSAL vs. M/S. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jun 25, 2020)

1. The present Report dated 28.10.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 3 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that vide their application dated 25.03.2019 filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Applicant No. 1 and the Applicant No. 2 had alleged profiteering by the ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SNOW FOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Jun 24, 2020)

PROCEEDING OF THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING UIS, 98 or THE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 Sub:- GST ACT, 2017 - Advance Ruling U/s 98 - liability to tax under GST Act in respect to application dated 18.02.2020 from M/s. Snow Fountain Consultants, House No. 259, Sector-5, Vikas Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - Order- Reg. 1) M/s. Snow Fountain Consultants, House No. 259, Sector-5, Vikas Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226 022 (here-in-after called 'the applicant') is a regi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


2
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
10 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-7

GSTR-7 for the m/o Apr 2025 (For TDS Deductors u/s 51 - Section 39(3)).

☑ Monthly | GSTR-8

GSTR-8 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For TCS collection by E-Commerce Operators - Section 52(4)].

11 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-1

GSTR-1 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayers) - N.No. 83/2020.

13 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o Apr 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).