Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,973 Results

M/S. IZ-KARTEX NAMED AFTER PG KOROBKOV LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jun 29, 2020)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such furth...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S SWAYAM


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jun 29, 2020)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such furth...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. 2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 03rd June, 2020 passed by respondent No.1 whereby it has kept the provisional attachment orders dated 05th March, 2020 as well as corrigendum dated 01st June, 2020 alive after specifying that the reason for attachment was that proceeding under Section 67 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as “CGST Act”) was pending...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HERO SOLAR ENERGY PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Haryana | Jun 26, 2020)

1.1 Brief Facts of the Case: 1.1 Hero Solar Energy Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as “the Applicant”) is a company incorporated and registered under the Companies Act, 1956. It is also registered under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 at (M/s Hero Solar Energy Pvt. Ltd., Ground Floor, 506/12, Jacubpura, Near Sadar Bazar, Gurugram) with GSTIN 06AADCH1476P1Z7. The Applicant has proposed to enter into the business of setting up of Solar Power Generating System (here...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KSC BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Haryana | Jun 26, 2020)

1. M/s KSC Buildcon Private limited is incorporated as Private limited company under the provisions of The Companies Act, 1956 and is also registered under the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with the provisions of the Haryana State Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 (hereinafter known as the “Applicant”). 2. That the applicant is engaged in the business of providing composite supply of work contract including sale of goods and also indulged in the...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioners, 2 in numbers, Managing Director and Director of Kerala Communicators Cable Ltd., through the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has approached this Court with the following prayers: “i. Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Exhibit P2 as illegal and unauthorized. ii. Issue a direction to refund with interest to the petitioners Rupees One Crore collected by the Respondent ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S BR INDUSTRIES vs. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jun 26, 2020)

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Manish Goyal, learned Additional Advocate General, assisted by Sri B.P. Singh Kachhawah, learned Standing counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The petitioner herein seeks to challenge the order dated 17.01.2020 which is consequential to the seizure order dated 31.08.2018. It is admitted that the order dated 31.08.2018 is the subject matter of challenge in Writ Tax No.1298 of 2018, which is pending consideration. We do not find any reaso...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHAHZAD ALAM vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Jun 26, 2020)

Heard Sri Vidya Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, and Sri Rishi Chaddha, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. This anticipatory bail application (under section 438 Cr.P.C.) has been moved seeking bail in Case Crime No. 350 of 2020 under sections 420, 424, 467, 468, 120B IPC and section 122/132 U.P. Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, Police Station Sihani Gate, District Ghaziabad , during the pendency of the investigation. Submission made by the learned co...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHRI M. SRINIVAS vs. M/S. VIJETHA SUPERMARKETS PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jun 26, 2020)

1 The present Report dated 23.12.2019, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed an application alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of the product “Frozen Green Peas” supplied by him. The Applicant had alleged that the Respondent had not r...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SMT. HONEY MACKER vs. M/S. PIVOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jun 26, 2020)

1. The present Report dated 27.12.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that vide her application dated 03.08.2018 filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Applicant No. 1 had alleged profiteering by the Respondent in respect of purch...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


2
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
10 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-7

GSTR-7 for the m/o Apr 2025 (For TDS Deductors u/s 51 - Section 39(3)).

☑ Monthly | GSTR-8

GSTR-8 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For TCS collection by E-Commerce Operators - Section 52(4)].

11 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-1

GSTR-1 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayers) - N.No. 83/2020.

13 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o Apr 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).