Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,922 Results

These petitions have been filed against the interim order passed by the High Court. Mr. S.V. Raju, Learned ASG appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the next date of hearing fixed before the High Court is 12-2-2021. We request the High Court either to dispose of the writ petition(s) itself or take a final decision on the interim application on the next date of hearing i.e. 12-2-2021. In case, final decision cannot be taken on the above said date, a short adjournment may be g...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SH. GAURAV vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Bombay High Court | Jan 6, 2021)

Heard. 2. This is an application for grant of bail in case No. F. No. DGGSTI/NZU/12(4)52/GrD/2020-21 for the offence punishable under Section 132(1)(i) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short “Act of 2017”). 3. It is stated that the applicant is a Director of public limited company - ‘M/s. Dee Vee Project Ltd., having GSTIN No. 27AAECD4619B1Z0. That its corporate office is situated at Korba, and head office at Raipur (C.G.). 4. The applicant ca...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing. 1. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge a communication dated 25.11.2020/01.12.2020 (Annexure-9 to the writ petition), by which the bank account of the petitioner in the respondent no.3-Bank (“the Bank”) has been attached by respondent no. 2, purportedly under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the Act”). 2. The contention of Mr. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This appeal, has been filed under Section 107 of the Central moods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by M/s. Nirmal Industries Private Limited., 4A Unit-II, Matasya Industrial Area, MIA District-Alwar (hereinafter also referred  to  as  "the  appellant")  against the Order-in-Original reference No. ZN0804200416904, dated 23-4-2020 (hereinafter called as the "impugned order") passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods & Services Tax Division-B...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Sri S.Ravi, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Bhaskar Reddy Vemireddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri T.C.Dhana Sekhar, learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax for respondent Nos.1 to 3, Sri N.Harinath, learned Assistant Solicitor General for 4th respondent, Sri Metta Chandrasekhara Rao, learned Counsel for 5th respondent and Sri Y.Nagi Reddy, learned counsel for 6th respondent. 2. In the present writ petition, challenge is to the order passed by the Assistant C...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KAILASH CHANDRA BISOYI vs. STATE OF ODISHA


(Orissa High Court | Jan 5, 2021)

Heard Mr. A. Sanganeria, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.K. Muduli, learned Addl. Government Advocate, for the State-opposite parties by Video Conferencing mode. 2. Mr. P.K. Muduli, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State accepts notice for opposite party nos.1 to 3. 3. Mr. A. Sanganeria, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition being identical to W.P.(C) No.5933 of 2020, the same may be disposed of in terms of the order dated...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DILIP BABULAL JAIN vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 5, 2021)

1. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with Case No.CBIC-DIN-20200665VB00002SBJ10 registered under Sections 132(1)(a)(b)(c)(d) of the CGST Act. 2. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions. 3. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner is stated to be a proprietary concern engaged in the supply of hill produce including cardamom; and that it has been an assessee to General Sales Tax, on the rolls of the 1st respondent. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner – Sri.P.Deepak, submits that the 2nd respondent is the holder of a cardamom E-Auctioneer License, namely Ext.P1, issued by the License Board as per the Cardamom (Licensing and Marketing) Rules, 1987 and that on 01.01.2021; and that a consignme...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHINE PLAST vs. ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER


(Kerala High Court | Jan 5, 2021)

The petitioner says that they are the manufactures of "Roto Fabric Cloth Bags" for the consumption of the Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation, but that when they tried to transport it on the strength of Ext.P1 - Tax Invoice and Ext.P2 - E-way bills, it has been detained by the respondent, alleging that the product is actually cotton bags and therefore, within the sweep of Section 31 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S RUKSHO PRODUCTS vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 5, 2021)

1 We have heard Mr. Varis Isani, the learned counsel appearing for the writ applicant and Mr. Trupesh Kathiriya, the learned A.G.P. appearing for the State respondent. 2 The subject matter of challenge in this writ application is to the order of detention passed in Form GST MOV­06 dated 6th November 2020 and also the notice dated 9th December 2020 issued in Form GST MOV­10. 3 It appears from the materials on record that the goods and the conveyance came to be seized and detain...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)