Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,922 Results

SITAL KUMAR PODDAR


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jan 11, 2021)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within thirty days from the date of communication of this ruling, or within such further time as m...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS FEDERATION L..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Jan 8, 2021)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST ACT, 2017 & UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 1. M/s Karnatka Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd., (formerly known as Karnataka Milk Federation (KMF)) (called as the ‘Applicant’ hereinafter), having GSTIN number 29AAAAK1110G1Z7, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of the CGST Act, 2017 & KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in FORM GST ARA-01, discharg...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DHRUV KRISHAN MAGGU vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Delhi High Court | Jan 8, 2021)

CM No. 28105/2020 in WP(C) 5454/2020 CM No. 32276/2020 in WP(C) 10130/2020 1. While the CM No. 32276/2020 has been filed by the Petitioner in W.P.(C.) No. 10130/2020 seeking interim protection, CM No. 28105/2020 has been filed by Respondent nos. 2 and 3 in W.P.(C.) No. 5454/2020 seeking vacation of interim protection granted vide order dated 20th August, 2020. 2. It is pertinent to point out that when W.P.(C.) No. 5454/2020 was listed before this Court for the first time on 20th A...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1 We are not inclined to entertain the Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. 2 The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed. 3 Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1 There is delay of 238 days in filing the Special Leave Petition which has not been satisfactorily explained. Even otherwise, we have gone through the Special Leave Petition and do not find any merit in the same. 2 The Special Leave Petition is, therefore, dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PREMIER SOLAR SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Jan 7, 2021)

Sub:- C.T. Department Authority for clarification and Advance Rulings – Certain clarification sought by M/s. Premier Solar systems Private Limited – Application withdrawn - Regarding. In the reference 1st cited, M/s. Premier Solar systems Private Limited, has sought certain clarifications in Advance Ruling. Through the reference 2nd cited, All the Joint Commissioner (CT), All Deputy Commissioners (CT), All the Assistant Commissioners(CT), All the Senior Officers in the O/o Com...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J. (Oral) CM APPL. 375/2021 1. Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. 2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 121/2021 3. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 impugns the action of search carried out at the Petitioner’s business premises on 30th September, 2020, under Section 67 of the Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ‘DGST Act’) read with Rule ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
[1] Heard Mr.B.N.Majumder, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. K.Dey, learned Addl. GA appearing for the respondents. [2] By means of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the Order No.2 dated 27.05.2020 [Annexure 7 to the Writ Petition] passed by the Superintendent of State Tax, Churaibari Enforcement Wing, North Tripura. By the said order, the liability of the petitioner of paying the CGST and SGST has been determined @₹ 3,56,990/-. Moreover, since the p...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S JAY STEELS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jan 7, 2021)

Heard Sri Shubham Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Ashok Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos.1, 2 and 3 and Sri Mata Prasad and Sri Apurva Hajela for respondents nos.4 and 5. The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs:- "(a) Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to accept the manual GSTR 3B return from the petitioner and to process the same for the period August, 2018 to August 2019; (b) Mandamus directing...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DEVENDRA DWIVEDI vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Supreme Court | Jan 7, 2021)

W.P.(Crl) No.272/2020, 273/2020 and 276/2020 1 Mr Mukul Rohatgi, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, seeks the permission of the Court to withdraw the petitions with liberty to move the High Court in appropriate proceedings. 2 The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. W.P.(Crl.) No. 298/2020 1 Invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution, the following reliefs have been sought by the petitio...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)