Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,950 Results

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Nitin Kr. Pasari and Mr. Piyush Chitresh, A.C. to learned A.G. Writ petitioner approached this Court on blocking of its electronic credit ledger due to non-filing of GSTR-3B by its vendor (respondent no.4) though GSTR-I was filed by him. Two demand notices (Annexure-5 series) bearing nos.39 and 40 of the same date i.e. 5thAugust 2020 were issued by the Deputy Commissioner, State Taxes(respondent no.3). The instant notices were issued under Rule...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. RENUKA AUTOMOTIVE vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Karnataka High Court | Feb 1, 2021)

1. Sri. Sudhirsingh R Vijapur, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. Smt. Archana P. Tiwari, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.3 and 4. 3. Sri. Mallikarjun Sahukar, learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for respondent Nos.5 to 8. 4. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for a mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representations made by the petitioner for o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Nitin Kr. Pasari and Mr. Piyush Chitresh, A.C. to learned A.G.. Writ petitioner approached this Court on blocking of its electronic credit ledger due to non-filing of GSTR-3B by its vendor (respondent no.4) though GSTR-I was filed by him. Two demand notices (Annexure-5 series) bearing nos.39 and 40 of the same date i.e. 5thAugust 2020 were issued by the Deputy Commissioner, State Taxes(respondent no.3). The instant notices were issued under Rul...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. In pursuance to the order dated 22nd January, 2021, the counsel for the respondent informs that the father of the petitioner had visited the office of the Commissioner, Goods and Services Tax (GST) and has furnished all the requisite information and the transactions in the account of the petitioner were found to be pertaining to the petitioner only, without having any GST implications and the respondent is satisfied that there is no need to continue with the attachment. 2. The petition...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicants have prayed for the following reliefs; "(A) To issue writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ(s) to direct the Respondent No.3 to release the documents as mentioned in Form GST INS- 02 dated 06.02.2020 (Annexure-C), after retaining photocopies of the same within a time frame to be fixed by the Hon'ble Court; (B) To issue writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ(...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHRI ARASURI TRANSPORT CO. vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2021)

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr. Parth Bhatt, the learned Standing Counsel waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of respondent no. 1 and Mr. Chintan Dave, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent no.2. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant, has prayed for the following reliefs: “7(a) To quash and set aside the order of Detention dated 31/08...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GENPACT INDIA PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jan 29, 2021)

By this order, we propose to dispose of three writ petitions i.e. CWP Nos. 10302, 18876 and 16305-2020. In CWP Nos. 10302 and 16305-2020, challenge is to the orders dated 27.05.2020 and 05.08.2020 (Annexures P-9 and Annexure P-1, respectively) passed by the Appellate Authority, whereby the refund claimed by the petitioners has been rejected. In CWP-18876-2020, the petitioner has straightway approached this Court, challenging the order dated 11.09.2020 (Annexure P-1) of the Adjudicatin...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KSF-9 CORPORATE SERVICES PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Jan 29, 2021)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST ACT, 2017 & UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 M/s. KSF-9 Corporate Services Pvt Ltd., (hereinafter referred as ‘applicant’), having GSTIN: 29AAFCK8154M1ZV, filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017 and under Section 97 of the KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of the KGST Rules 2017, in FORM GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each under the CG...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KSF-9 CORPORATE SERVICES PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Jan 29, 2021)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST ACT, 2017 & UNDER 98(4) OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 M/s. KSF-9 Corporate Services Pvt Ltd., (hereinafter referred as ‘applicant’), having GSTIN 29AAFCK8154M1ZV, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017 and under Section 97 of the KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of the KGST Rules 2017, in FORM GST ARA-01, discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each under the CGST ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DR. H.B. GOVARDHAN


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Jan 29, 2021)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST ACT, 2017 & UNDER 98(4) OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 Dr. Hosahalli Boraiah Govardhan, No.85, Near Corporation Bank, 1st Floor, Magadi Main Road, Anjananagar, Bengaluru 560091, (hereinafter referred to “the applicant”) having GSTIN 29SUOPB7362A1ZO, has filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of the CGST Act,2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of the KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules 2017, i...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)