^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

M/S. RENUKA AUTOMOTIVE vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
(Karnataka High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

Pet. Counsel

Raghavendra B.hanjer

Res. Counsel

Sudhirsingh

Archana P. Tiwari

Petitioner / Applicant	M/S. RENUKA AUTOMOTIVE
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Court	Karnataka High Court
State	Karnataka
Date	Feb 1, 2021
Order No.	WRIT PETITION NO.223539 OF 2020 (T-RES)
Citation	2021(2) TAXREPLY 3876
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
1. Sri. Sudhirsingh R Vijapur, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. Smt. Archana P. Tiwari, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.3 and 4. 3. Sri. Mallikarjun Sahukar, learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for respondent Nos.5 to 8. 4. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for a mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representations made by the petitioner for opening of the GST Common Portal so as to enable the petitioner to claim the benefit of the input credit by uploading Form GST-TRAN-3 declaration. 5. The petitioner claims to be a dealer of M/s. Ashok Leyland Light Vehicles. Prior to coming into force of the GST Act on 01.07.2017, the petitioner was not required to make payment of any tax on the sale of the vehicles as central excise or otherwise. The same being made by the manufacturers. However, on coming into force of the GST Act, there is....