Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,135 Results

Petitioner is challenging Ext.P9 order issued by the 3rd respondent. By virtue of Ext.P9, petitioner's claim for refund of taxes paid under Central Goods and Services Tax as well as State Goods and Services Tax have been refused on the ground that there is no evidence to prove the payment of tax by the petitioner. 2. As per the order of demand of tax and penalty issued under section 129(3) of the State Goods and Services Tax Act, petitioner remitted an amount of ₹ 12,26,064/- with t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. This matter is taken up in the vacation court. 2. The challenge in the present petition is to the Show Cause Notice dated 1st October, 2021 issued by the Joint Commissioner of CT & GST, Rourkela-II Circle U/s.74 of the Odisha Goods and Sales Tax Act, 2017 (OGST Act). 3. It appears that after process of adjudication on the Petitioner’s application for refund, on 6th November, 2018 the refund order was in fact passed in favour of the Petitioner by the same authority, i.e. t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RASI NUTRI FOODS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Oct 21, 2021)

Rasi Nutri Foods, 1/67A, 1 /67B, Salem Trichy Main Road, Ayeepalayam, Athanur, Rasipuram, and Namakkal 636301 (hereinafter called the 'Applicant') is registered under the GST Vide GSTIN 33AAGFR9140J1Z2. They have sought Advance Ruling on the following question:- Whether Notification No.39/2017-CT(R) dated 18.10.2017 read with G.O.Ms.No. 140 dated 17.10.2017 issued by the Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, would be applicable to the Applicant's activity of manufactur...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TAMILNADU POLYMER INDUSTRIES PARK LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Oct 21, 2021)

TAMILNADU POLYMER INDUSTRIES PARK LIMITED (hereinafter called the ‘Applicant’ or ‘TPIPL’) 19-A 3rd floor, Rukmini Lakshmipathy Road, Egmore, Chennai 600008 is registered under the GST Vide GSTIN 33AAFCT3356C1ZO. They have sought Advance Ruling on the following questions: 1. Applicable GST rate for EPC contract engaged in works, viz; site grading, earth filling, road works, storm water drains, utility corridor, street lighting, water storage and distribution system....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HEALERSARK RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Oct 21, 2021)

At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the Central Goods and Service Tax Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act. HEALERSARK RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED, No.72, Vengadmangalam ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

FORMATIVE TEX FAB vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Oct 21, 2021)

1. This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction against respondent No.4 to release the provisional attachment of the property as under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter be referred to as the “CGST Act”) on the ground that continuing the attachment after completion of one year is violative and dehors the provisions of Section 83 of the CGST / GGST with the following prayers:-   a) to direct...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): “1(a) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the appellate order dated 16.12.2020 issued vide form GST APL-02 by the respondent no.2 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner has been rejected on grounds of delay; (b) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the order dated 16.08.2019 passed by the respondent No. 3 under section 140 and 73(9) of the Bihar goods and servi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

STEEL CENTRE vs. STATE TAX OFFICER (INSPECTIONS 1)


(Madras High Court | Oct 21, 2021)

Mr.G.Natarajan, learned counsel for writ petitioner in all the three captioned writ petitions is before this Virtual Court. The issue involved in all the three writ petitions is one and the same is learned counsel's say. Three separate orders made by the lone respondent in the three captioned main writ petitions, all dated 08.07.2021 bearing reference Nos. 33AAMFS6152PIZL/2017-18, 33AAMFS6152PIZL/2018-19 and 33AAMFS6152PIZL/2019-20 qua assessment years 2017-2018, 2018- 2019 and 2019-2020 ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TANAY CREATION vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Oct 20, 2021)

1 The petitioner is before this Court seeking the writ of certiorari challenging the order in Form GST MOV-11 dated 15.09.20211 passed by respondent No.2 essentially on the ground that without serving a copy of the order and without even granting an opportunity of hearing, the stay order is passed in clear violation of the principles of natural justice as also violation of the provisions of section 130 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act (“the CGST Act” for short). 2 T...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SAI RUBBER WORKS vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.


(Madhya Pradesh High Court | Oct 20, 2021)

1. The instant petition is preferred by the petitioner seeking following reliefs: “In prevailing facts and circumstances it is most humbly prayed before this Hon'ble Court that the present writ petition filed by the petitioner may kindly be allowed and further the impugned order dated 28-11-2020 (Annexure P/1) and order dated 2-07-2019 (Annexure P/2) may be quashed and set aside in the interest of justice.” 2. Precisely stated facts of the case are that petit...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


14
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).