Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,162 Results

In the captioned writ petitions, a summary of order dated 15.04.2021 bearing reference No.ZD3304210013356 made under Section 73 of 'Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Tamil Nadu Act 19 of 2017)' [hereinafter 'TN-GST Act' for the sake of convenience and clarity] and subsequent intimation dated 12.08.2021 bearing reference GSTIN 33AACCA5297L1ZF/2017-18 made under Section 161 of TNGST Act have been called in question. To be noted, these two orders shall be collectively ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KRIT KUNAL DHAWAN vs. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS


(Gauhati High Court | Oct 29, 2021)

Heard Dr. A. Saraf, learned senior counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Gogoi, learned counsel for the respondent in the Finance and Taxation Department of the Govt. of Assam. 2. Two communications bearing No. ZD1810210008801 and NO. ZD181021000894S both dated 08.10.2021 are assailed in this petition. 3. The brief facts of the case narrated in the two communications are extracted below:- “During investigation it was found that the taxpayer has utilized ITC from dubi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MANISH, RAJESH AND INDER PARTAP SINGH vs. STATE OF HARYANA


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Oct 29, 2021)

1. This order shall dispose off the above mentioned three regular bail petitions filed on behalf of Manish, Rajesh and Inder Partap Singh as they arise out of the same FIR i.e. FIR No.571 dated 4.6.2019 under Sections 259, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471/120-B IPC at Police Station Chandni Bagh, District Panipat. 2. The instant FIR was lodged at the instance of ASI Vinod Kumar wherein it has been alleged that on 4.6.2019 when he along with other police officials was present near grain market brid...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is, inter alia, engaged in manufacture of sale of multiple products such as locks, furniture, industrial products, etc. 2. By presenting this writ petition dated November 14, 2019, the petitioner has mounted a challenge to a show cause notice dated August 27, 2019 issued by the Joint Commissioner, CGST & C.Ex, Navi Mumbai, respondent no.3. It has been alleged in such notice that the petitioner “availed i...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NANHE KHAN TIMBER STORES vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Oct 29, 2021)

Heard Shri Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Jagdish Mishra, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-State. By means of this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 29.03.2018 passed by the respondent no.4-Assistant Commissioner, Mobile Squad Unit, Bulandshahr under Section 129(3) of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 UPGST Act . Further challenge is to an order dated 03.09.2020 passed by the respondent no.3-Additi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

UNION OF INDIA vs. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. & ORS.


(Supreme Court | Oct 28, 2021)

1. This appeal emanates from the judgment and order dated 05.05.2020 passed by the High Court of Delhi in W.P. (C) No.6345 of 2018, whereby the High Court allowed the writ petition filed by respondent No.1 herein and read down paragraph 4 of the Circular No. 26/26/2017­GST dated 29.12.2017 (“impugned Circular”) issued by the Commissioner (GST), Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Excise and Customs, GST Policy Wing (Commissioner (G...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
(Per Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah) The petitioner has filed the present writ petition for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate Writ Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of MANDAMUS holding that the impugned Order vide A.O.No.ZH3709210D89763, dated 27.09.2021 for the Tax Periods 2017-18 (07/2017 to 11/2017 and 01/2018) whereby he has disallowed the Input Tax Credit of ₹ 72,84,060-00 under the IGST Act, 2017 and further imposed Pena...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NAYARA ENERGY LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Oct 28, 2021)

1. The petitioners before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging inaction on the part of the respondents with the following prayers. a) this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondents to disburse the refund amount of ₹ 50,88,42,582/- to the Petitioner No.1 forthwith; b) this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of Ma...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Apprehending arrest in Crime No. 0178 of 2021 registered with APMC Police Station, Navi Mumbai for the offences punishable under Section 420, 406 and 34 of the I.P.C, Applicant seeks pre-arrest bail. 3. On 10th August, 2021, this Court declined the pre-arrest bail to the Applicant. Whereafter, Applicant moved this application in the changed circumstances and in support of the application, relied on a letter dated 13th August, 2021 addressed by...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CRM-W-1331-2021 For the reasons given in the application, it is allowed. Sur-rejoinder on behalf of the respondent to the replication filed by the petitioner is taken on record. CRWP-8017-2021 Instant petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing the respondent to release the detenue, namely, Sahil Garg, who has been arrested by the respondent alleging commission of offence under Section 1...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


14
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).