Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,170 Results

PREMIER SOLAR POWERTECH PVT. LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Nov 29, 2021)

M/s. Premier Solar Powertech Private Limited, 20/4, 5th Main, 6th Cross, SK Garden, Benson Town, Bangalore-560 046, having GSTIN 29AAFCP8578C1ZZ have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules, 2017, in form GST ARA-01 without discharging the required fee of ₹ 5,000/-each under CGST/KGST Act 2017. The Applicant is a Private Limited Company, registered ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NANDAGAON TRADERS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Nov 29, 2021)

Sri Imtiyaz Maqboolsab Nandgaon, M/s. Nandgaon Traders, CMC No.586/588/2, Plot No.5, C S Patil Building, C Block, APMC Yard, Ranebennur-581115, having GSTIN 29AWGPN5462K1Z, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of the KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of the KGST Rules, 2017, in form GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/only under the KGST Act. 2. The Applicant is a proprietary conce...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

METALEX STEEL STRIPS PVT. LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Nov 29, 2021)

M/s Metalex Steel Strips Private Limited, Plot No.158/159, KIADB Industrial Area, Jigani Link Road, Bommasandra, Bengaluru -561 206, having GSTIN 29AAFCM4924P1ZT have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules, 2017, in form GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- only under KGST Act. 2. The Applicant is a private limited company, registered under ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NPS INDUSTRIES


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Nov 29, 2021)

M/s. NPS Industries, No.3, Industrial Estate, Gokul Road, Hubli, Dharwad-580030, having GSTIN 29AAFFN6283R1ZA, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules, 2017, in form GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 4,975/only under the KGST Act and ₹ 25/- only under CGST Act. The Applicant is a partnership firm, registered under the provisions of Central ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JSW STEEL LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Orissa High Court | Nov 29, 2021)

1. This writ petition by M/s. JSW Steel Ltd. was filed on 27th October, 2021 challenging the show cause notices (SCNs) dated 29th September, 2021 issued by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax Enforcement Unit, Barbil, Odisha (Opposite Party No.4) alleging wrongful utilization of Input Tax Credit (ITC) in contravention of Sections 16, 20, 122, 132 of OGST/CGST Act read with Rule 54 (1A)(a) of the OGST/CGST Rules "intentionally by reason of fraud and willful mistake." 2. The writ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VARINDER SINGH vs. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Nov 29, 2021)

The petitioner is an accused in the alleged commission of offence under Section 132(1)(b) of Central Goods & Services Act, 2017 (for short 'CGST Act, 2017), punishable under sub-clause(i) of Section 132(1) of CGST Act, 2017, who was released on regular bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. vide order dated 24.2.2021 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana,  subject to his fulfilling certain conditions including executing bail bonds/surety bonds etc., but con...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHIVAKANT vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Nov 29, 2021)

Heard Shri Shivakan (petitioner) is present in person. In this writ petition, it has been directed against the order of seizure assessment under the relevant G.S.T. Act vide order impugned dated 17.09.2021 passed by respondent no. 3. A copy of order dated 17.09.2021 has been annexed as Annexure-2 to the writ petition whereby the Assistant Commissioner (Mobile Squad)-2nd Kanpur Nagar as far order wherein Vehicle No. U.P.78 BT 2746 (Three Wheeler) and the owner of the vehicle was Janardan. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GULAM RASOOL KHAN vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Telangana High Court | Nov 29, 2021)

Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 Petitioner has challenged legality and validity of the order in original dated 24.6.2021 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Begum Bazar GST Division, Hyderabad, i.e. respondent No.5. 3 The said order has been passed under Section 73 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) r/w corresponding provision of Section 73 (1) of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It may be mentioned that the aforesaid order was passed...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

STATE TAX OFFICER AND OTHER vs. Y. BALAKRISHNAN


(Kerala High Court | Nov 29, 2021)

An interim order is the cause of this review petition. By the interim order, this Court directed release of goods that were the subject matter of proceedings for confiscation under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for brevity ‘the Act’). A review petition against the interim order is preferred by the State Tax Officer, leading to seminal questions on the scope and ambit of the powers of release of goods while the confiscation proceedings are going on. 2. The prima...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: “i. To issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, to direct the Respondents to open the common portal for the Petitioner to be able to file TRAN-1 electronically; or alternatively to allow the Petitioner to avail the said lTC by manually revising TRAN-1 or by furnishing the details in Form GSTR 3B or in any other manner so as to enable the Petitioner to avail ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


16
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).