Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,170 Results

In this petition the petitioner seeks Writ of Mandamus to respondent Nos.2 and 3 either to open the online portal so as to enable the petitioner to again file the rectified TRAN-I form electronically which was originally filed physically at Annexure-B or to permit the petitioner to manually transition the credit amounting to ₹ 4,96,163/- to their Electronic Credit Ledger under the GST regime and for other reliefs. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for respo...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present writ petition has been filed aggrieved of the inaction on the part of the respondents in permitting the petitioner to submit the TRAN-1 Form under GST Act claiming for the input tax credit. 2. The brief facts relevant for the disposal of the present writ petition is that petitioner is a Trader registered under the G.S.T. Act dealing in two and three wheeler spare parts holding GSTIN-22ABHPN8512G1ZU. By way of the introduction of the new GST regime w.e.f. 01.07.2017, the...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SALIM K.M vs. THE STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS


(Kerala High Court | Dec 2, 2021)

Petitioner challenges Exts.P11 and P12 order issued under Section 130 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [for short, the Act]. As per the said order, goods transported by the petitioner, which includes MS scrap were detained and thereafter on verification it was found that there was an attempted evasion of tax and hence the goods were subjected to confiscation proceedings, pursuant to Exts.P6 and P6(a) notices. 2. Even though, petitioner has approached this Court at the stag...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT & COMMON WEALTH


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Dec 1, 2021)

1. M/s Natural Resource Management & Common Wealth (hereinafter referred to as ‘Applicant’), Kusum-46, Shrawan Estate, Durgesh Vihar, JK Road, Bhopal is person registered under the provisions of CGST Act (the act) and MP GST Act read with section 20 (v) of IGST Act, vide GSM 23AAFTS6928N1ZW, having principal place of business at the above mentioned address. 2. The provisions of the CGST Act and MPGST Act are identical, except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a spe...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

THE ERODE CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Dec 1, 2021)

1. In terms of Section 102 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act 2017/Tamilnadu Goods & Services Tax Act 2017(“the Act”, in Short), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the applicant within a period of six months from the date of the Order. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MAHINDRA SPLENDOUR CHS LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Dec 1, 2021)

The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s Mahindra Splendour CHS Ltd., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. Whether the applicant is liable to pay GST on the contribution received from its members? 2. If yes, whether the applicant can...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JASVANT SINGH vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Dec 1, 2021)

Heard Shri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri A.C. Tripathi, learned counsel for the State - respondents. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following, amongst other, reliefs:- "I. Issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order / information dated 16.02.2019 passed by the respondent no. 3 (Annexure No. 12 to the writ petition); II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the natu...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has filed these writ petitions for the Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2019-2020. The case of the petitioner is that the respondents have not communicated the respective Assessment orders to the petitioner. 2. That apart, it is submitted that the Assessment Order has been passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention to the dash board as shown the screen shot of the dash board availa...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ. 1. The present petition seeks a direction to the Opposite Parties to implement the order dated 17th September, 2018 passed by the Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax, Bolangir Range, Bolangir (hereinafter referred to as ‘Revisional Authority’) directing restoration of old registration number under the GST Act. The Petitioner has also sought the quashing of the demand dated 4th March, 2021 as a result of denial of the Input Tax Credit (ITC) to the Petitioner....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ANMOL BINDAL vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Dec 1, 2021)

1. Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant; Sri Dileep Chandra Mathur, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant - Anmol Bindal, seeking anticipatory bail in connection with summons/notice dated 02.09.2021 issued under Section 70 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Dehradun Regional Unit, 3rd Floor,...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


16
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).