Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

KRISHNA FASHION vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Delhi High Court | Jan 18, 2022)

1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. 2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 16th March, 2020, whereby Petitioner’s current bank account maintained with Union Bank of India has been provisionally attached as well as the order dated 06th February, 2020 blocking the Petitioner’s Electronic Credit Ledger. Petitioner also seeks directions to the Respondents to de-freeze the Petitioner’s account and unblock the Pet...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NEXT EDUCATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Jan 17, 2022)

1. M/s. Next Education India private limited, 8-2-269/A/2/1 to 6, 1st Floor, 3rd Floor, East Wing, Sri Nilaya Cyber Spazio, Road No.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500034 (36AABCH9484P1ZQ) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HYLASCO BIO-TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Jan 17, 2022)

1. M/s. Hylasco Bio-technology Private Limited, Plot No. 4B, Alexandria Knowledge Park, Turkapally Village, Shameerpet Mandal, Telangana, Hyderabad-500078 (36AACCH9043H1ZJ) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissim...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SATYAM PETROCHEMICALS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.


(Bombay High Court | Jan 17, 2022)

After arguing the matter for some time, Mr. Rastogi, learned counsel for the petitioner states that his client would cooperate with the respondents in response to the impugned summons annexed at pages 382 and 383 of the writ petition and will not seek any unnecessary adjournment. Statement is accepted. 2. It is made clear that if the respondents propose to take any coercive steps against the petitioner based on the documents that will be produced by the petitioner and the evidence that wo...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Upon hearing the learned counsel for parties, the Court made the following order: 1. The matter is taken up virtually. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel for the respondents. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner has made the following prayer:- I. “Issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari, calling the record of the case and quash the summoning order dated 10.01.2022 issued to petitioners. (...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant a Company situated at Jerusalem through its Authorized Representative in India, has prayed for the following reliefs: “12. (a) that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records pertaining to the Petitioner’s case and after going into the validity and l...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KRISHNA BHAVAN FOODS AND SWEETS


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Jan 13, 2022)

1. In terms of Section 102 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act 2017/Tamil Nadu Goods & Services Tax Act 2017 (“the Act”, in Short), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the applicant within a period of six months from...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NAVBHARAT IMPORTS


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Jan 13, 2022)

1. In terms of Section 102 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act 2017/Tamil Nadu Goods & Services Tax Act 2017 (“the Act”, in Short), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the applicant within a period of six months from...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and having perused the material placed on record, we find no reason to consider interference in the well-considered and well-reasoned order dated 2nd June, 2021, as passed by the the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad in Writ Petition No. 9688 of 2020. Rather, we are clearly of the view that the error, if any, on the part of the High Court, had been of imposing only nominal costs of ₹ 10,000/- (Rupees Ten T...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Shri Sanjay Bhat, learned counsel for the respondent No.5. The petitioner has filed the present petition challenging the validity of notice dated 12.3.2020 issued by the Superintendent (Preventive), CGST Central Excise, Manik Bag, Indore vide Annexure P/3, as well as, constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Rule 86A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017. Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.1 to 4 submits that durin...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


18
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).