Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

SIDDHARTHA CONSTRUCTIONS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Mar 2, 2022)

M/s. Siddhartha Constructions, Hyderabad, 6-3-668/10/8, Durganagar, Durganagar Colony, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500082 (36AAXFS8120Q1Z6) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissimilar provisions, a ref...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioner is an assesseee under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Pursuant to proceedings initiated under section 129 of the CGST Act, 2017 (for short, 'the Act'), an order was issued under section 129(3) of the Act. Since the appellate mechanism under the Act was not fully functional, petitioner had approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in W.P.(C) No.6417 of 2018. 2. After the Appellate Authority has became fully functional, petitioner expresse...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this Civil Application, the applicant (original writ applicant) has prayed for the following reliefs: “(a) This Hon. Court may be pleased to modify order dated 23.10.2019 and the applicant may pleased be allowed to collect and deposit the disputed amount of tax with interest under the GST Act under protest which may be treated as subject to the outcome of the main petition. (b) Such other order as deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may be kindly be passe...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VANSH INTERNATIONAL vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 2, 2022)

1. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:- 12(A) Be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, or a writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other appropriate order or direction for calling upon the refund application of the petitioner and after going through the same, respondent no.5 may be ordered to sanction the IGST refund claim along with claim of duty drawback and other export entitlements of the peti...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SIDDHARTHA CONSTRUCTIONS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Mar 2, 2022)

1. M/s. Siddhartha Constructions, Hyderabad, 6-3-668/10/8, Durganagar, Durganagar Colony, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500082 (36AAXFS8120Q1Z6) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissimilar provisions, a refer...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SIDDHARTHA CONSTRUCTIONS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Mar 2, 2022)

1. M/s. Siddhartha Constructions, Hyderabad, 6-3-668/10/8, Durganagar, Durganagar Colony, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500082 (36AAXFS8120Q1Z6) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissimilar provisions, a refer...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. N.K. Pasari and Mr. Sachin Kumar, learned A.A.G-II appearing for the Respondent State. 2. Writ petition has been preferred for the following relief (s): a. For issuance of an appropriate writ, order directions, directing upon the respondents to show cause as to how and under what authority of law, Summery Order under Rule 142 could be issued without issuance of any show cause and initiation of adjudication proceedings in terms of Sections 6...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Ms. M Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S C Keyal, learned counsel for the respondents in the GST Department. 2. The petitioner which is a registered contractor and deals with manpower supply service and is also a service provider to the entity Oil India Limited and having service tax registered bearing no. ABZPA6595LST001 is aggrieved by the demand-cum-show-cause notice dated 29.09.2020 issued by the Joint Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax,...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. In this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order of the appellate Commissioner dated March 18, 2021 confirming the original order dated September 11, 2019 passed by the adjudicating authority under section 129 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 for detention of the goods in question on the grounds that the e-way bill relating to the consignment in question had expired one day before, i.e. in the midnight of...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This intra court mandamus appeal filed by the appellant challenging the order dated 20.12.2021 in WPA 19537/2021 by which the learned writ court directed the respondents to file affidavit-in-opposition and did not grant the prayer for interim relief for restoration of the appellant’s certificate of registration under the provisions of West Bengal Goods & Service Tax Act and Central Goods & Service Tax Act. With the consent of the learned counsel on the either side the writ petit...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


19
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).