Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

The question that falls for consideration in this writ petition is whether the petitioner can seek for a mandamus for refund of amounts lying in the petitioner's electronic cash ledger ? 2. The writ petitioner is a proprietary concern and is represented by its proprietor Sheik Dawood. This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus to direct the respondent to refund ₹ 88,17,754/- lying in the petitioner's Electronic Ledger under Chapter IX of CGST Rules, 2017. The aforesaid Ele...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has filed this writ petition for a Mandamus to direct the first respondent to enable the petitioner to file respondents to either open the portal so as to enable the petitioner to again file TRAN-1 electronically or to accept manually. 2.The case of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the petitioner was a Central Excise Assessee. It is submitted that as on month of June 2017, the petitioner had an accumulated CENVAT credit of ₹ 5,09,612/- under the provisions of ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has filed this writ petition for a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to permit the petitioner/tax payer to file or revise form Tran-1 already filed either electronically or manually and consequently avail the benefits towards that. 2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner attempted to transition the unutilised input credit under the provisions of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. It is the case of the...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This Writ Petition has been filed for a Mandamus to permit the petitioner to upload the GST – Tran-1 Form either by opening the GST portal or by allowing them to file manually. 2.It is the specific case of the petitioner that they did not upload GST - Tran-1 in time on the input tax credit that was available on the date when the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 persists. The petitioner appears to have sent a representation on 26.06.2020 explaining the reasons for not filing Tran...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ITALIAN EDIBLES PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Mar 3, 2022)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter also referred to CGST Act and SGST Act respectively) by M/s. ITALIAN EDIBLES PVT. LTD 309/1/8/8, BLOCK 3. MANGAL UDHYOG NAGAR, PALDA, INDORE, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, 452001 (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant), registered under t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. In this matter, petitioner has challenged the impugned show-cause notice for cancellation of registration of the petitioner and suspending the registration of the petitioner by the same impugned show-cause notice itself and petitioner has further challenged the impugned showcause notice for cancellation of registration on the ground that the same was passed without providing any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and, furthermore, the i...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This intra Court appeal takes an exception to order dated 14.09.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge by which the writ petition preferred by the respondent No.1 has been disposed of with the direction to the appellants to consider the applications for refund submitted by the respondent No.1 and to pass suitable orders thereon within a period of four weeks, in the light of observations made in the order. In order to appreciate the appellants' grievance, relevant facts need mention. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has challenged the impugned orders, dated 09.11.2021 for the assessment years 2018-2019, 2019-2020, 2020-2021 and 2021-2022. The impugned orders are challenged on the ground that the impugned orders have been passed without compliance of the mandatory requirements of Section 75(4) of the respective Goods and Service Tax enactments, 2017. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the impugned orders preceded show cause notices, dated 28.09.2021, the petit...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BHARDWAJ CONSTRUCTIONS vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Mar 3, 2022)

Heard Sri Navin Sinha, leaned senior advocate assisted by Sri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.P. Singh Kachhwaha, learned standing counsel for the State-respondents. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following relief: "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 27.11.2021 (Annexure-1) passed by respondent no.3 in gross violation of principles of natural justice." ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Present writ petition has been filed seeking refund of ₹ 33,70,851/- for the month of November, 2019 along with interest thereon on account of export of goods as zero rated supplies by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner’s refund application dated 4th November, 2020 has not been processed till date and neither any acknowledgment in FORM GST RFD-02 nor any deficiency memo has been issued in RFD-03 within stipulated time limit of fifteen day...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


20
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).