Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,306 Results

MUNJAAL MANISHBHAI BHATT vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | May 6, 2022)

1. Since the issues raised in all the captioned writ applications are the same, those were taken up for hearing analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgement and order. 2. For the sake of convenience, the Special Civil Application No.1350 of 2021 is treated as the lead matter. 3. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “A. This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to stri...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

S.P.Y. AGRO INDUSTRIES LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Andhra Pradesh High Court | May 5, 2022)

Heard Sri Dr. M.V.K. Moorthy, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri P.Rosi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri N. Harinath, learned Assistant Solicitor General for respondent No.1 and Sri Sri S.V.S. Prasada Rao, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos.2 to 4. 2. The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “….pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly in the...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners being aggrieved by the action of the respondent GST concerned denying the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by their impugned order dated 27th December, 2021 to the petitioner on purchase of the goods in question from the suppliers and asking the petitioners to pay the penalty and interest under the relevant provisions of GST Act, on the ground that the registration of the suppliers ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the proceedings of the respondent in Order No.19/2021-2022 dated 17.03.2022 passed under Section 129(3) of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and to quash the same as passed without considering the objections dated 15.03.2022 filed by the petitioner and also passed contrary to Section 129(1)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Central Goods and Se...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

USHMAN KHAN vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS


(Madhya Pradesh High Court | May 4, 2022)

The petitioner by filing this petition has prayed for the following reliefs: “i. That this hon’ble Court may please to quash and set aside the order dated 04/01/2022 passed by respondent No.2 and order dated 04/02/2022 passed by respondent No.3 and further pleased to direct for restoration of registration of the petitioner. ii. Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deem fit may also is granted”. 2. The facts as canvassed in the memorandum of Writ Petiti...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RADHA KRISHNA ENTERPRISE vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | May 4, 2022)

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, the learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this writ-application under Article-226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:- 6(a) To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari and or any other appropriate writs, order or direction for calling of records of proceedings initiated pursuant to show-cause notice dated 16.11.2021 and after perusing ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2] GST Registration Certificate of the Petitioner is cancelled vide order dated 20.01.2021. The Petitioner filed First Appeal on 29.09.2021. The delay in filing the Appeal was condoned, however, the Appeal was dismissed on the ground that the Petitioner ought to have preferred a remedy under Section 30 of the CGST Act to file an application for revocation of cancellation of the GST Registration Certificate. 3] We have heard learned counsel for...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MADHAV COPPER LIMITED vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | May 4, 2022)

1. The matter was taken up for further hearing today. We have heard Mr. Mihir Joshi, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Chetan Pandya, the learned advocate appearing for the writ applicant, Mr. Vinay Bairagar, the learned AGP appearing for the respondents Nos.1 and 2 respectively and Mr. Pranav Desai, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3 – Bank of Baroda. 2. To a larger extent, the parties have been able to arrive at some consensus to facilitate this Court t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BARANJ COAL MINES PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | May 4, 2022)

The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. BARANJ COAL MINES PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions: Question 1 - Whether the activity carried out by the Applicant under the Agreement is supply of Goods or is a supply of ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KPC PROJECTS LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | May 4, 2022)

Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The Present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively) by M/s. KPC Projects Ltd., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. In view of the constr...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).