Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,306 Results

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Deepak Kr. Sinha and Mr. Rahul Saboo, S.C.-I representing the State. 2. The writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs: (a) “For quashing the ex-parte Order for Cancellation of IR Registration of the Petitioner, contained in Ref. No. 10. ZA201019018277W dated 25.10.2019(Annexure-4), issued by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Ranchi South Circle (Respondent No. 4), whereby the said Respondent No. 4, without affordin...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present Report dated 28.02.2020 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. Briefly stated, a reference was received by the DGAP from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering on 28.06.2019, to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of an application, filed by the Applicant No. 1, alleging profiteering by the Respondent, ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VINAIR SYSTEMS & SERVICES


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | May 10, 2022)

1. M/s. Vinair Systems & Services, 318-b, Manjeera Majestic Commercial, JNTU Hitech City Road, KPHB Colony Hyderabad, Medchal Malkajgiri, Telangana, 500072 (36AIIPK6710F1ZE) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any d...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | May 9, 2022)

At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CGST Act, 2017’ and the ‘GGST Act, 2017’) are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act, 2017 ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SWAN LNG PVT. LTD


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | May 9, 2022)

1. M/s. Swan LNG Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad (‘the appellant’ for short) has entered into a Concession Agreement dated 18th October, 2017 with the Gujarat Maritime Board and Government of Gujarat for development, construction, operation and maintenance of Liquefied Natural Gas (‘LNG’) Port with a Floating Storage and Regasification Unit (‘FSRU’) facility near Jafrabad, Gujarat, on Build, Own, Operate and Transfer basis.  As a part of developing the LNG Port a...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ASHISH JAIN THROUGH SH. RACHIT JAIN AND OTHERS vs. GLS INFRAPROJECTS PVT. LTD


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | May 9, 2022)

1. The Present Report dated 27.11.2020 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) in response to the Authority's Interim Order no. 23/2019 dated 26.12.2019 passed under Rule 133 (4) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The said order was issued to refer back the DGAP's Report dated 25.06.2019 which was furnished by the DGAP after investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. A Report dated 29.10.2020 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) on 29.10.2020 after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the Report are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed application before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 and alleged profiteering in respect of the supply of 04 goods namely Anut...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

STATE OF GUJARAT vs. MADHAV COPPER LIMITED


(Gujarat High Court | May 6, 2022)

1. In Special Civil Application No.15201 of 2021, preferred by the original petitioner, the company incorporated in the year 2012 and engaged in the business of copper products, had passed the order dated 23/11/2021, where the prayers sought by the petitioner company were as follows: “(A) To issue a writ of mandamus and/or writ of certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing to quash and set Provisional Attachment Orders at Annexure-A, Annexure-B, Annex...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. This matter is taken up by virtual/physical mode. 2. Assailing the Order dated 8th February, 2022 passed by the Commissioner of CT & GST, Odisha in Revision Case No. BHU-105/G/2021-22 under Section 80 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, “the OGST”) read with Rule 158 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (for brevity, “the OGST” Rules), directed against the demand of interest for the periods from April, 2019 to December, 201...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GODWAY FURNICRAFTS vs. THE STATE OF AP AND OTHERS


(Andhra Pradesh High Court | May 6, 2022)

1) The present application is filed under Order XLVII Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 114 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking review of the Order, dated 11.11.2020, passed in W.P. No. 10350 of 2020, wherein this Court dismissed the Writ Petition confirming the Order of the Joint Commissioner (ST), Appellate Authority under GST Act, Vijayawada, who in turn upheld the Order of the Assistant Commissioner (ST), Circle-II Division, Suryaraopeta, Vijayawada. 2) The review petitioner is th...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).