Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. In this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 3rd March, 2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Revenue, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence and Enforcement, under Section 74(9) of the State GST Act, on the ground that the same is without jurisdiction by contending that the initiation of proceeding in question under the State GST Act is without jurisdiction and he cannot act as an officer under the State GST....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Mr.V.Prasanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents and is fully armed with instructions to enable consideration of the relief sought for in this writ petition. Thus, by consent expressed and in fact at request, final orders are passed disposing this writ petition, though it is listed for admission. 2. The petitioner claims to have purchased iron scrap from various dealers and states that it was in the process of transporting the same from Guwahati to Coimb....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. Both these Writ Petitions being WPA No. 17567 of 2021 filed by the CGST authorities and WPA No. 12676 of 2021 filed by the assessee company arise out of the same impugned order dated 5th February, 2021 with corrigendum orders dated 17th February, 2021 and 29th July, 2021, passed by the Appellate authority being Joint Commissioner of Income, CGST & CX, Appeal-I, Kolkata, in Appeal No. 12/CGST/Kol-North/2021 filed by the assessee company ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAM CONSTRUCTION vs. THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Jharkhand High Court | Jun 9, 2022)

2. Writ petition was preferred for the following relief (s). i. For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction for quashing/setting aside the Notice dated 24.07.2020 (Annexure-8) issued under Section 79 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'CGST Act' for short) by Respondent No.2, wherein without carrying out any adjudication process either under Section 73 or 74 of the CGST Act, garnishee notice has been issued to the Petitioner's....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The appeal is directed against the order dated February 9, 2022 passed in WPA 1745 of 2021. By the impugned order, the learned Judge was pleased to hold that, despite the assessee receiving further evidences with regard to the quantum of tax liability subsequent to the conclusion of the order of refund, there was no material irregularity in the order of refund warranting interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Learned Advocate appearing for the appellant/writ petition....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of parties taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission. 2] This writ petition is preferred against the order of the learned Additional Commissioner dated 19th February 2021 and against the order dated 23rd February 2021 passed by the learned Additional Commissioner whereby the claims of the GST preferred by the petitioner have been rejected. 3] Facts leading to this application can be stated in short as under:- The....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ADI ENTERPRISES vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jun 8, 2022)

1. Rule. Mr. Priyank P. Lodha, learned Central Government Standing Counsel waives service of rule on behalf of the respondents. 2. By way of the present application, the applicants - original petitioners have prayed to direct the respondents to grant refund of the amount of IGST already paid by the applicants pursuant to the Entry No.10 of Notification No.10/2017-IGST (Rate) dated 28.6.2017 with appropriate interest on such refund. 3. Mr. Uchit N. Sheth, learned advocate appearing for....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Re : I.A. No.CAN 2 of 2022 1. This is an application praying for condonation of delay of 37 days in preferring the instant appeal. 2. Having heard Mr. Kanodia, learned advocate appearing for the applicant/appellant and Mr. Ghosh, learned Government advocate appearing for the respondents, we are of the considered view that sufficient cause has been shown for belated presentation of the appeal. 3. Accordingly the application is allowed. Re : M.A.T. 714 of 2022 4. This intra-....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Rule. Mr.Trupesh Kathiriya, learned AGP waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing today. 3. By way of the present petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed as under: “8(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in nature of certiorari or any other appropri....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GURUNANAK ROMELL LLP


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jun 8, 2022)

(Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Gurunanak Romell LLP, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. a. Whether Entry No. ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
25
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).