Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

Heard Mr. Tushar Jarwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Mamilla Ashwin Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.Raji Reddy, learned Senior Standing Counsel, Commercial Tax for the respondents. 2. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has challenged legality and validity of the order dated 04.02.2022 issued by the 3rd respondent levying total tax (CGST + SGST) of Rs.2,21,38,236.40 for the audit period April, 2019 to M....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Mr.Adithya Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Prakash, learned counsel for Mr.Rajendran Raghavan, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent. 2.Though the respondent has not filed a counter, the learned counsel for the respondent is in possession of necessary particulars and is ready to argue the matter and hence present orders are passed after hearing both the learned counsel. 3.The petitioner assails an order dated 13.05.2022 rejecting his application for....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

OZONE PROCON PVT. LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jun 16, 2022)

1. Rule. Learned advocate Mr. Utkarsh Sharma waives service of notice for the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned advocates for the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing. 3. The petitioner is engaged in the business of import of crude oil of edible grade from outside the country. The purchases of goods in question are made on high seas basis and the imports are on Cost Insurance Freight [‘C.I.F’ for short]. The person from whom the goods are purchased i....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has challenged the respective Assessment Orders in these writ petitions for the Assessment Years 2017-18 and 2018-19. There is difference in the ITC claimed by the petitioner in its GSTR-2B and the information captured in the GSTR-2A as compared to the GSTR 1 of the supplier for the respective Assessment years. The demand has been workout as Rs.8,21,123/- and Rs.3,53,519/- for the Assessment Year 2017-18 and Assessment Year 2018-19 respectively. 2. On behalf of the petition....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHREYA AGGARWAL vs. STATE OF PUNJAB


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jun 16, 2022)

Petitioner is seeking regular bail in case FIR No.0030 dated 13.03.2021, under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC and Section 201 IPC added subsequently, registered at Police Station PAU, Ludhiana. Counsel for the petitioner contends that previously another complaint was made in the year 2020 under Section 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Punjab State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with Section 20 of Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 201....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Mr.Rajnish Pathiyil, learned Senior Panel counsel accepts notice for the respondent and is armed with instructions to proceed with the matter to enable final disposal of this matter even at this stage. Hence, by consent of both learned counsel, this Writ Petition is disposed even at the stage of admission. 2. The petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari challenging order dated 25.04.2022 demanding interest in terms of Section 50 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (in short '....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AGRAWAL BUILDCON,


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Chhatisgarh | Jun 15, 2022)

PROCEEDINGS [U/s 98 of the Chhattisgarh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (herein- after referred to as CGGST Act, 2017)] No. STC/AAR/04/2022 Raipur Dated 15/06/2022 M/s Agrawal Buildcon, C/a Agrawal Traders, Main Road, Korba, Chhattisgarh, 495677 (here in after referred to as the applicant) GSTIN-22ASSPA1067D127 has filed an application U/s 97 of the Chhattisgarh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 dated 02/02/2022 enclosing duly filled in Form ARA-01(the application form for....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner has sought a mandamus directing the respondents being the Assistant Commissioner of State Taxes/R1 and the Goods and Services Taxes Network/R2 to credit the amount relating to input tax credit (ITC) of Rs.16,21,227/- and Rs.4,24,136/- to the electronic credit ledger of the petitioner. 2. Mr.G.Natarajan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Richardson Wilson learned Additional Government Pleader for R1 and Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Standing Counsel for R2 have bee....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Heard learned advocate Ms. Hetal Patel for learned advocate Mr. Chetan K. Pandya for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Trupesh Kathiriya in Special Civil Application No.17882/2021 and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Krutik Parikh in Special Civil Application No.17883/2021. 2. Issues involved in both the petitions are similar inasmuch as order of seizure passed by by respondent no.2 pertaining to articles belonging to the petitioner have been challeng....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This application has come up for consideration on the point of interim relief. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for defreezing at least the saving bank account of the proprietor of the petitioner firm. Mr. Gautum Kejriwal, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the coercive action has been taken by freezing the account from the petitioner’s firm including the saving bank account of the proprietor as a measure for recovery of the amount of tax interest and penalt....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
25
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).