Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,644 Results

Short Summary:
The court observed that the petitioner filed a delayed appeal against a tax assessment order uploaded online without their knowledge. Although the appeal was beyond the statutory limitation of three m..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court disposed of the writ petition by allowing it to be withdrawn with liberty to raise all contentions at the appropriate time and forum, referencing a prior order dated 3rd July 2023 in a relat..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SAI SERVICE PVT. LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Aug 1, 2023)

Short Summary:
The advance ruling clarified that a registered car dealer purchasing motor vehicles for demonstration (test drive) purposes can claim input tax credit (ITC) on such capitalized vehicles only if there ..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court held that cancellation of GST registration without providing the assessee an opportunity of being heard violates the statutory mandate under Section 29(2) of the GST Act. It emphasized that ..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SANJIB KUMAR PAL vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Tripura High Court | Aug 1, 2023)

Short Summary:
The court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the rejection of appeals filed beyond the prescribed limitation period under Section 107(4) of the Tripura State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Al..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court, after hearing the counsel, granted condonation of delay but chose not to interfere with the challenged judgment and order. Consequently, the special leave petition was dismissed. Any pendin..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING vs. PRASU INFRABUILD PVT. LTD


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 31, 2023)

ORDER 1. The present Report dated 02.03.2023 has been received from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (hereinafter referred to as the “DGAP”) on 02.03.2023 by the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter referred to as the “Commission”) after a detailed investigation under Rule 133 (5) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules”). The brief facts of the case are that the erstwhile Nationa....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. The present Report dated 21.02.2023 had been received from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (hereinafter referred to as the “DGAP”) on 23.02.2023 by the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter referred to as the “Commission”) after a detailed investigation under Rule 133 (5) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules”). The brief facts of the case are that the erstwhile Nationa....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING vs. SUBWAY SYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 31, 2023)

ORDER The present Report dated 26.02.2021 has been received from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 133(5) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) vide its Order No. 14/2020 dated 11.03.2020 passed in the case of M/s. Le Reve Pvt. Ltd. had directed the DGAP to examine M/s. Subway Systems India Pvt. Ltd. for possible violation of Sec....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. The present Report dated 15.02.2023 had been received from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (herein after referred to as the “DGAP”) on 16.02.2023 by the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter referred to as the “Commission”) after a detailed investigation under Rule 133 (5) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules”). The brief facts of the case are that the erstwhile Nation....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
25
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Jun

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for May 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o May 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Jun

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2024-25 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).