Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,927 Results

ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 22.11.2021 passed by the second respondent Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST) (FAC) in AP/GST/138/2020. 2. By the impugned order dated 22.11.2021, the second respondent Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST) (FAC) has partly allowed the appeal filed by the petitioner in AP/GST/138/2020. Relevant portion of the impugned order dated 22.11.2021 reads as under:- A careful reading of the above will reveal that the above section ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioners challenge the order in original for cancellation of registration dated 06.04.2023 and the order dated 07.02.2023 passed in appeal under Section 107 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "the Ac...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pending this petition, Commissioner of the Central Goods and Service Tax, Delhi North has sanctioned part of the refund, however, has not granted any interest. He submits that the orders sanctioning refund do not deal with the component of interest and in any event do not hold the petitioner responsible for delay in processing the refund claim. 2. Copies of the refund sanctioned orders, one dated 27.12.2023 and four dated 28.12....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This matter is taken up by hybrid mode. 2. Learned Standing Counsel (CT & GST Department) appearing on an advance notice states that as long as delay in filing the revocation application is condoned, and provided the Petitioner complies with all the requirements of paying the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc. due, the 3B Return Form filed by the Petitioner will be accepted by the Opposite Parties. 3. In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner’s invok...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BASHIR AHMAD DAR vs. UT OF J&K AND OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Apr 29, 2024)

ORDER Show cause notice was issued to the petitioner which was not responded to by him consequently leading to cancellation of registration under GST Act, 2017 vide order dated 25.02.2021. 2. Aggrieved of the order dated 25.02.2021, the petitioner preferred an appeal but that too was dismissed because of delay in submission of the appeal. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has instructed him to make statement before this Court that he undertakes to deposit ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER By these four writ petitions, orders in original pertaining to assessment periods 2017-2018 to 2020-2021 are challenged on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demands on merits. 2. The petitioner is engaged in the business of man power supply relating to cleaning, ripening, sorting and packing of groceries, fruits and vegetables. The petitioner asserts that he was unaware of proceedings culminating in orders impugned herein sin...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 01.09.2023 and proceedings consequent thereto are challenged in this writ petition. 2. The petitioner is engaged in the business of buying and selling cloth and apparel. By asserting that the petitioner was unable to respond to the show cause notice or participate in proceedings due to the petitioner being diagnosed with cancer in 2021, the present writ petition was filed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the tax proposal pertains...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner is before this Court in these Writ Petitions against the impugned assessment orders, dated 22.06.2023 passed by the respondent for the assessment years 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner's mother namely, D.Parvatham, was proprietrix of M/s.Parvathaa Exports and that she died on 13.05.2023. However, the impugned orders have been passed on 22.06.2023 in the name of the petitioner's mother, who was carrying o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RANA CHOWDHURY vs. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & OTHERS


(Calcutta High Court | Apr 29, 2024)

ORDER 1. The present writ application has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order of cancellation of registration of the petitioner under the WBGST Act, 2017 Hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”. 2. It is the petitioner’s case that on or about 26th November 2021 the petitioner was served with a notice of show cause as to why the registration of the petitioner under the said Act shall not be cancelled for the petitioner having failed to file his returns for...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER By asserting that the petitioner was unaware of proceedings culminating in the impugned order since the notices and orders were uploaded on the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab on the GST portal and not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode, the present writ petition was filed impugning order dated 11.10.2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the tax proposal pertains to the discrepancy between the petitioner's GSTR 3B re...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


28
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)