^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

KGK CONSTRUCTION vs. THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER, KARUR
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Pet. Counsel

M. N. Bharathi

Res. Counsel

K. Vasanthamala

Petitioner / Applicant	KGK CONSTRUCTION
Respondent	THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER, KARUR
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Apr 29, 2024
Order No.	Writ Petition No. 11198 of 2024 And W. M. P. Nos. 12279 & 12280 of 2024
Citation	2024(4) TAXREPLY 9771
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER By asserting that the petitioner was unaware of proceedings culminating in the impugned order since the notices and orders were uploaded on the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab on the GST portal and not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode, the present writ petition was filed impugning order dated 11.10.2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the tax proposal pertains to the discrepancy between the petitioner's GSTR 3B return and the auto-populated GSTR 2A. On instructions, learned counsel submits that the petitioner is agreeable to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. He further submits that the petitioner has a good case, including with regard to limitation. 3. Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice for the respondent. She points out that the intimation was issued in June 2023, the show cause notice in July 2023 and a personal hearing notice was issued on....