Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ORDER The petitioner is the legal heir of the deceased assessee namely, Late. A. Sathianesan. It appears that the petitioner’s father, who was the registered dealer under the provisions of the respective GST enactment, died on 08.02.2023. After his father’s death, the petitioner appears to have applied for cancellation of the GST registration on 08.05.2023, which was also acceded and the registration was cancelled in Form GST REG 19 on 25.05.2023 with effect from 01.05.2023. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 20.11.2023 is assailed primarily on the ground of denial of a personal hearing. 2. The petitioner asserts that he was unaware of proceedings culminating in the order impugned herein because the notice and order were uploaded on the GST portal and not communicated to the petitioner through any of the other modes prescribed in Section 169 of applicable GST enactments. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the impugned order an...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER Petitioner has filed the present petition seeking for setting aside of the order of adjudication bearing Reference No. CTO/LGSTO-51/LR/D&R-04/2023-24 dated 02.05.2023 passed by the respondent, copy of which is produced at Annexure-A. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that there were certain discrepancies between the ITC claimed as per GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A and noticing such discrepancies, the Authority has adjudicated and directed excess claim of ITC to be reversed. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER The petitioner has called in questioned the liability of the petitioner as per order dated 29.12.2023 passed under Section 73 (9) of the Central Goods and Services Tax / Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short 'CGST/KGST Act') by respondent No. 1 for the tax periods of 2017-18 and 2018-19. The petitioner has also sought for setting aside of the notification dated 13.07.2022 at Annexure-'N' as well as notification dated 06.04.2023 at Annexure-'P&...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER These three writ petitions are directed against orders in original pertaining to assessment periods 2019-2020, 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, respectively. Upon receipt of show cause notices dated 09.12.2023, the petitioner asserts that it replied on 04.01.2024 and dealt with the four tax proposals. The orders impugned herein were issued after offering personal hearing to the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that tax proposals were made under four heads...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner appears to be a Government contractor, who had rendered service to the Government Departments. It appears that the petitioner had paid the tax, although a portion of the tax payable by the petitioner was deducted by the concerned department and was reflected in Form GSTR-07 under Rule 61 of the TNGST Rules, 2017 read with Section 15 of the TNGST Act, 2017. Later, the department realised that the petitioner had not paid tax and had recovered the amount from the petitio...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 07.07.2023 is challenged on the ground that the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. The petitioner asserts that he was unaware of proceedings culminating in the impugned order dated 07.07.2023 because the notice and the impugned order were uploaded in the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab on the GST portal and not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode. The petit...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

K.S. PAREED vs. STATE OF KERALA & OTHERS


(Kerala High Court | Jun 4, 2024)

JUDGMENT This batch of writ petitions contains three sets of cases. In some cases, the respective supplier had remitted the tax (GST) but not reflected in their return GSTR due to some technical reasons. Another set of petitioners are those who have received the goods or services and have valid tax invoices, proof of payment of the value of goods along with the GST component to the respective suppliers, but the respective suppliers had not remitted the GST on the supply made by them to th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 07.07.2023 is challenged on the ground that the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. The petitioner asserts that he was unaware of proceedings culminating in the impugned order dated 07.07.2023 because the notice and the impugned order were uploaded in the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab on the GST portal and not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode. The petit...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER By this common order, the above five Writ Petitions are being disposed of, in the light of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 08.01.2024 in a batch of Writ Petitions starting from W.P.No.30974 of 2022 in the case of Tvl.A.Venkatachalam vs. The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Palladam II Assessment Circle, Palladam. 2. In the aforesaid order, guidelines have been issued pertaining to the show cause notice issued, which have be...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)