Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ORDER An order in original dated 17.10.2023 is assailed on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. The petitioner asserts that she was unable to respond to the show cause notice on account of personal difficulties. Since the petitioner was unable to defend the tax proposal on merits, the present writ petition was filed. 2. Apart from the denial of reasonable opportunity of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that statutory rules were violated by initiati...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 28.12.2023 is assailed on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. The petitioner asserts that he was unaware of proceedings culminating in the order impugned herein because the part time Accountant engaged by the petitioner had not informed the petitioner about these proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the tax proposal arose as a result of the petitioner committing an inadvertent error while filling up Form GS...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SUNDER SYNTHETICS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Telangana High Court | Jun 6, 2024)

ORDER: PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL Sri M.Umashankar, learned counsel, appears for the petitioner and Ms.B.Sapna Reddy, learned Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC. 2. With the consent, finally heard. 3. The singular point involved in this case is whether respondent No.3 was justified in passing the impugned order dated 28.03.2024 whereby appeal of petitioner was dismissed without entering into the merits of the case. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner by takin...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER In these writ petitions, the petitioner seeks a direction to the first respondent to accept the appeal by treating the date of filing of the appeal as 18.06.2021. 2. In the above case, refund rejection order was issued against the petitioner in relation to claim for refund of IGST on ocean freight. The appeal was presented on 18.06.2021 before the appellate authority. As per Rule 108(3) of applicable GST Rules, the petitioner was required to file a hard copy of the impugn...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first to fifth respondents to disburse the Service Tax, Interest and Penalty amount to the petitioner for the services rendered by him for a period from 2015 to 2017 based on his representation dated 07.08.2019 within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court. 2. The petitioner has placed reliance on the decision rendered by this Court on 17.07.2023 in the case of V.Gopalakrishnan Vs. T...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER By this common order, these Writ Petitions are taken up for disposal, after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Additional Government Pleader for the respondent. 2. The petitioner is the legal heir of Late.A.Radhakrishnan, Proprietor of the R.K. Distributor, died on 19.04.2022. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner was unaware of the impugned orders and the notices that preceded the impugned orders as they were posted in the GST co...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER By this common order, these Writ Petitions are disposed of at the time of admission, after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondent and after recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is willing to deposit 10% of the disputed tax as condition for the case being re-heard. 2. specific case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is a small time medical agency and ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the time of admission itself, after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent. 2. The specific case of the petitioner is that although there were discrepancies between the returns of GSTR- 01 and GSTR-3B, deficit tax was paid by the petitioner in GSTR-09 on 14.03.2020 and thus, the impugned demand is unsustainable. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner wou...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This Writ Petition is disposed of at the time of admission after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 2. By the impugned order, the respondent has confirmed the demand proposed in GST DRC-01A dated 24.09.2023 bearing Ref.No.ZD330923164699S and GST DRC-01 dated 29.09.2023 bearing Ref.No.ZD330923246551F. 3. The petitioner's case is that the petitioner has explained the purported discrepan...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER The petitioner is before this Court aggrieved by the impugned orders all dated 07.08.2023 for the assessment years 2017-18 to 2021-22. 2. These impugned orders have preceded the notices issued in Form GST DRC – 01A dated 27.04.2023 and Form GST DRC -01 dated 02.06.2023 for the assessment year 2017-18. The details of the respective notices issued to the petitioner for the respective assessment years are as under: S.No W...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)