Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,927 Results

COMMON ORDER By this common order, both the Writ Petitions are disposed of after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondent. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled on 08.11.2019 with effect from 20.08.2017 pursuant to the show cause notice issued to the petitioner in Form GST REG 17 under Rule 22(1) of TNGST Act, 2017, on 06.12.2018. 3. It is submitted t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT PER RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J: 1. Supplementary affidavit filed in Court today on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order dated 27th February, 2024, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 107 of the West Bengal/Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) had been rejected. 3. The petitioner claims to be the sole proprietor of M/s. S...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This Writ Petition is disposed of at the time of admission after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent. 2. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner is challenged the impugned Order-in- Original No.11/2024 GST MAD-GST-000-SUP-11/2024 dated 15.03.2024 from the File No.54/2024. 3. By the impugned order, the demands that were proposed in ASMT 10 dated 24.03.2023 in O.C.No.37/2023, DRC 01A dated 17.10.2023 and DRC 0...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An assessment order dated 30.03.2024 is assailed on the ground that documents filed by the petitioner were not taken into consideration while confirming the tax proposals. 2. The petitioner asserts that she was awarded contracts by the Coimbatore Municipal Corporation for providing services in relation to cleaning of drains, sanitary work and solid waste management. Since such services are exempt under Notification No.12/2017 dated 28.06.2017, no tax was paid thereon. Upon recei...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 18.01.2024 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. By asserting that the petitioner had engaged a part time accountant to handle GST compliances and was therefore unaware of proceedings culminating in the impugned order, the present writ petition was filed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an inadvertent error was committed while filing the GSTR 3B return...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order dated 26.08.2023 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. By asserting that the show cause notice and other communications were uploaded in the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab on the GST portal and not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode, the present writ petition was filed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the pe...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DINDAYAL COLLOIDS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jun 26, 2024)

Note 1: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. Note 2: At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DECCAN CEMENTS LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jun 26, 2024)

Note 1: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. Note 2: At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. Heard learned advocate Ms. Vaibhavi Parikh for the petitioner. 2. It was submitted that the petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of the impugned notice dated 07th June, 2024 in Form GST MOV-10 as well as impugned order of confiscation dated 15th June, 2024 issued by the respondent authority under Section 130 of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘the GST Act’). It was sub...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER: (PER HON’BLE JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL) Regard being had to the similitude of the questions involved on the joint request of the parties, the matters were analogously heard and decided by this common order. Facts:- 2. The facts are taken from W.P. No. 10390 of 2024. The petitioner is a proprietorship firm engaged in the manufacture and supply of zinc oxide and duly registered with Goods and Service Tax (GST) authorities of Telangana State. The petitioner claims it...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


27
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)