Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,927 Results

SR REALTORS vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER & OTHERS


(Madras High Court | Jun 28, 2024)

ORDER This Writ Petition is listed today in the 'end of the list' at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr.J.K.Jayaselan, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondents. 3. With the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate for the respondent, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. 4. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 30.12.2023 passed ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 06.02.2024 in respect of assessment period 2020-2021 is challenged both on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits and on the ground that the impugned order travels beyond the scope of the show cause notice. An intimation dated 13.09.2023 was issued to the petitioner in respect of about eleven defects. This was followed by show cause notice dated 10.10.2023. The show cause notice also dealt w...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SIDDHA MAHAJAN PVT. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Allahabad High Court | Jun 28, 2024)

ORDER 1. Heard Sri Mukesh Kumar Tewari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Sauabh Mishra, Advocate has filed memo of appearance on behalf of respondent no. 1 and Sri Digvijay Nath Dubey, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 2 and 3 and Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no. 4. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is registered with the GST Department under the provisions of U.P. G....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P.C. : 1 After the petition was heard for sometime, counsel on instructions sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an appeal. Counsel also stated that since petition has been pending before this court, the time to file the appeal would have expired. 2 Therefore, keeping open all rights and contentions of the parties petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file the appeal. If the appeal is filed within four weeks from today, it will be taken to have bee...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 26.12.2023 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. The petitioner asserts that it was not possible to participate in proceedings because the petitioner was unaware of proceedings on account of the show cause notice and other communications being uploaded on the “view additional notices and orders” tab of the GST portal and not communicated to ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MANNARAI COMMON EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT PRIVATE L..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Jun 27, 2024)

1. Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamilnadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-Section (1) of Section 100 of CGST Act 2017/ TN GST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed, is communicated. 2. In terms of Section 103 (1) of the Act, Advance Ruling pronounced by the Authority under Chapter XVII of the Act shall be binding only- (a) on the applicant who had sought it in respect of any matte...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT The petitioner is a company registered under the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, the ‘KSGST Act’). For the assessment year 2017-18, the 1st respondent issued Ext.P1 assessment order rejecting the petitioner's claim of input tax credit on the ground that the claim is in violation of Section 16 (2) (c) of the KSGST Act. According to the petitioner, at the time of reply to the show cause notice, the petitioner had brought it to the notice of...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate for the respondent. 2. The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order dated 28.12.2023 bearing reference in GSTIN:33AABCK1651R1ZC passed by the respondent for the assessment year 2017-18. The impugned order has preceded the notice, which has been replied by the petitioner and the personal hearing which has been appeared by the petitioner. However, the petitioner has not filed statutory appea...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAM STEEL vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER, DINDIGUL.


(Madras High Court | Jun 27, 2024)

ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 09.08.2023 bearing reference in GSTIN:33CNNPR2172L1ZJ/2022-23 passed by the respondent for the assessment year 2022-23. 3. By the impugned order, the respondent has confirmed the demand proposed in the show cause notice that preceded the impugned order for a sum of Rs. 5,98,768/- (IGST-Rs.1,21,898/- + SGST – R...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER By this common order, these two Writ Petitions are disposed of. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. The petitioner/proprietrix concern is before this Court challenging the impugned orders dated 30.05.2023 and 26.05.2023 bearing reference No.GSTIN: 33AUVPL3939J1Z0 for the assessment years 2021-22 and 2022-23, respectively, whereby the demands proposed in the show cause notices, that preceded the impugne...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


27
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)