Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,927 Results

ORDER The petitioner has challenged the impugned Order-in-Original No. 01/2022 – GST, dated 23.03.2022 passed by the fifth respondent. By the impugned order, the fifth respondent has confirmed the demand proposed in the Show Cause Notice that preceded with the impugned order. Operative portion of the impugned order reads as under:- “ORDER i. I confirm the demand of an amount of Rs. 22,50,53,102/- (Rupees Twenty Two Crore Fifty Lakh Fifty Three Thousand One Hundred and ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order dated 07.06.2022 passed for the Assessment Year 2017-2018. 2. It is informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that earlier, an assessment order dated 29.04.2022 came to be passed by the respondent for the very same Assessment Year 2017-2018, against which, the petitioner has filed an appeal before the appellate authority / Deputy Commissioner of (ST) Appeal, Madurai, on 07.06.2022 and the same is pending. In...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER This is a second round of litigation before this Court. Earlier, the assessment orders passed on 02.03.2020 by the Officer of the same rank as the respondent herein were challenged before this Court in W.P. (MD)No.8161 of 2020 etc. batch [M/s.Srinithi Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by its Director vs. The State Tax Officer (Intelligence), Ajudication – I, Madurai]. The said Writ Petitions were disposed of on 31.08.2020 at the time of admission, with the following ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PANKAJ MITTAL vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER


(Delhi High Court | Jul 1, 2024)

VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. Issue notice. Learned counsel for respondents accepts notice. 2. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under:- “(a) Allow the present petition and issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash and set-aside the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 02.05.2023 bearing reference no. ZA0705230061425 and subsequent Order of Cancellation of Registration dated 08.08.2023 bearing reference...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An assessment order dated 05.12.2023 is challenged in this writ petition on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. The petitioner states that he is a manufacturer of cashew nut kernels. Since he is not well versed with computer operations, it is stated that the petitioner was unaware of proceedings until after the impugned assessment order was issued. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the Deputy...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. Issue notice. The learned counsel for the respondents accept notice. 2. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that directions be issued to the respondent to cancel its GST Registration with effect from 31.03.2023. The petitioner also impugns an order dated 22.04.2024 whereby the petitioner’s request for cancellation of GST Registration with effect from 31.03.2023, was rejected. 3. The petitioner, Ms Gurmeet Kaur, is the...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Heard Ms. Pooja Talwar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arimardan Singh Rajpoot, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondent. 2. Challenge has been raised to the order dated 10.05.2024 passed under Section 74 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017 for the tax period 2018-19. 3. Primarily, it has been submitted that first a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner on 22.02.2024 for the date 11.03.2024. Though, the petitioner could not fi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order dated 12.05.2023 passed for the Assessment Year 2020-2021. 2. By the impugned order, the demand proposed in the notice in Form GST DRC – 01, dated 09.01.2023, has been confirmed, as the petitioner has failed to file the reply in time. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be given one opportunity to explain the case, as the petitioner has a fair case on merits. 4...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER In these Writ Petitions, the petitioners have challenged the following impugned orders passed by the respondents for the respective Assessment Years. Sl. No. W.P. (MD)No. Petitioner Impugned Order No. Date Assessment Year 1. 20925/2023 M.Antoney Selvan ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order dated 27.04.2024 is assailed primarily on the ground that the documents placed on record by the petitioner were not duly taken into consideration. A draft proposal dated 21.12.2023 was received by the petitioner pursuant to an audit. The petitioner replied thereto on 28.12.2023. A show cause notice dated 29.12.2023 was issued shortly after receipt of the petitioner's reply. The petitioner replied to such show cause notice on 29.03.2024. The impugned order was issued the...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


28
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)