Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,945 Results

SNEHASIS PANJA vs. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & OTHERS


(Calcutta High Court | Jul 3, 2024)

JUDGMENT RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J: 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record. 2. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order dated 16th February, 2024 passed by the appellate authority under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”). 3. It is the petitioner’s case that being aggrieved by the order dated...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SUKUMAR KUNDU vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Calcutta High Court | Jul 3, 2024)

JUDGMENT RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J: 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is retained with the record. 2. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging not only the show cause notice dated 26th July 2023 issued under Section 73 of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”) for the tax period from July 2017 to March 2018 but also the adjudication order dated 28th August 2023 issued under Section 73 (9) of the said Act, i...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 06.03.2024 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by respondent no. 2 (Superintendent, Ward-73) whereby, the petitioner’s GST Registration (GSTIN 07AAACA5800B1ZG) was cancelled. 2. The petitioner is also impugning the Show Cause Notice dated 14.02.2024 (hereafter the impugned SCN) pursuant to which the impugned order was passed. 3. Respondent no. 2 had issued the imp...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that the Show Cause Notice dated 17.08.2020 (hereafter the impugned SCN) and the order dated 27.08.2020 (hereafter the impugned order) passed pursuant to the impugned SCN be set aside. 2. The respondent authorities had issued the impugned SCN calling upon the petitioner to show cause why the petitioner’s GST Registration (GSTIN: 07AADHH0053H1ZP) should not be cancelled. The reason set o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAJENDRA KUMAR vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jul 3, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Bidhan Chandra Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents, Sri Ishan Deo Giri, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 & 3 - U.P. Expressways Industrial Development Authority. 2. The present writ petition is preferred praying inter alia with the following relief: "i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S. SIVAGNANAM, C.J.) 1. The appellant has filed this appeal challenging an order passed by the learned Single Bench dated 2nd April, 2024 in W.P.A. 7480 of 2024 declining to grant any interim order and direction has been issued to file the affidavits. 2. With the consent of the learned advocates on either side, the writ petition and this appeal are taken up together and are disposed of by this common judgment and order. 3. The...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the Revenue has filed a memo enclosing the copy of the letter of withdrawal of Provisional Attachment under Section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017 in Form GST DRC-22. 2. In light of the memo filed and after noticing the contention that the earlier attachment is withdrawn, the petition is disposed off. 3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to challenge Form GST DRC-22, in accordance with law. All contentions are kept open. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Petitioner in all these petitions has called in question the validity of the impugned orders whereby the appeals filed under Section 107(11) of the KGST/CGST Act, 2017 ('the Act' for brevity) were dismissed on the ground that the appeals were filed beyond time and the delay was such that it would be beyond the time that was condonable under Section 107(4) of the Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all these writ petitions should be disposed off taking...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER In this writ petition, an order in original dated 27.03.2024 is impugned on the ground of non application of mind. Upon receipt of show cause notice dated 19.01.2023, the petitioner replied on 08.01.2024. The impugned order dated 27.03.2024 was issued thereafter. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner referred to the impugned order and pointed out that defect no.1 related to alleged non payment of tax in respect of the sale of medicines. During this assessment period, he submits ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER In this writ petition, an appellate order dated 24.01.2024 is assailed. The petitioner had applied for refund under Section 54 of applicable GST enactments. Such application was rejected by order dated 13.04.2022. The petitioner carried the matter in appeal before the appellate authority by presenting such appeal online on 28.06.2022. The time limit for filing such appeal was up to 12.07.2022. On account of the hard copy of the appeal being submitted on 23.05.2023, the appeal was re...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


28
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)