Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

VM POLYMERS (MOHAN SUJATHA)


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Jul 24, 2024)

1. Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamilnadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-Section (1) of Section 100 of CGST Act 2017/ TN GST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed, is communicated. 2. In terms of Section 103(1) of the Act, Advance Ruling pronounced by the Authority under Chapter XVII of the Act shall be binding only- (a) on the applicant who had sought it in respect of any matter...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PRIMOVE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS PRI..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jul 24, 2024)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) Questions raised by the applicant in application filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. PRIMOVE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED the applicant, seeking an a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

LOKMAT MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jul 24, 2024)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. LOKMAT MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ROPPEN TRANSPORTATION SERVICES PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Jul 24, 2024)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST ACT, 2017 AND UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 M/s. Roppen Transportation Services Pvt. Ltd. (herein after referred to as “Applicant”), #80/1,81/1,81/2, Salarpuria Softzone, Green Glen Layout, Bellandur Village, Varthur Hobli, Bengaluru 560 103, Karnataka, having GSTIN 29AAHCR1710J1ZC. have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act. 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules. 2017 and Section 97 of KGST Act, ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER By this common order, all these Writ Petitions are being disposed of. 2. In these Writ Petitions, the petitioner has challenged the respective Assessment Orders dated 16.08.2023 and the consequential order passed under Section 161 of the TNGST Act, 2017, on 07.11.2023 rejecting the request of the petitioner for rectification of the purported mistakes committed in the respective Assessment Orders dated 16.08.2023. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J: 1. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, praying for the following reliefs: a) A writ/s of, order/s, direction/s in the nature of Prohibition restraining the respondents from giving effect to the impugned order of appeal dated April 23, 2024 till of a period of 3 months after the setting up of GST Tribunal under Section 110 of the relevant GST Acts; b) A writ/s of, order/s, direction/s in the nature of Prohibition restraining th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER By this writ petition, order in original dated 26.12.2023 is assailed on the ground that two parallel proceedings were initiated in respect of the same assessment period. The petitioner asserts that two parallel proceedings were initiated in respect of the same assessment period pursuant to scrutiny of returns. In view of the confusion entailed by the initiation of such proceedings, it is stated that the petitioner could not participate in proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER By this common order, all these Writ Petitions are being disposed of. 2. In these Writ Petitions, the petitioner has challenged the following impugned Assessment Orders:- Sl. No W.P. (MD) No. A.Y. Impugned Assessment Order dated Amount   1 14745/23 2019-20 ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO Both these Writ Petitions arise, essentially, out of the same set of facts and raise similar questions of fact and law. In such circumstances, both these Writ Petitions are disposed of by way of this Common Order. 2. Heard Sri V. Bhaskar Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V. Siddharth Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax. 3. The petitioners her...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

R.G. GROUP vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Tripura High Court | Jul 24, 2024)

ORDER PER Heard Mrs. S. Deb (Gupta), learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. Gautam, learned counsel for the respondents-revenue. 2. Petitioner claiming himself to be the transporter who is under a franchisee agreement with Merchant Express Logistic Private Limited, Guwahati to carry out pickup and delivery service at ‘Tripura Sector’ provided the vehicle bearing No.TR-01-AH-1562 for delivery of the goods from its warehouse at Bypass Road, Dukli, West Tripura for del...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)