Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,922 Results

ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 12.12.2023 passed by the respondent. 2. Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner used to receive advance and supply the products. Under these circumstances, the GST came into ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is retained with the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, praying for a direction upon the respondents to release the amount of Rs.5,22,500/- from the bank guarantee furnished by the petitioner, so that the same can be utilised for making payment of the pre-deposit for preferring the appeal which is a sum equal to 25 per cent of the penalty determined under Section 129(3) of the WBGST /CGST Act, 2017 (herei...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
WRIT PETITION NO. 13579 OF 2022 1. Mentioned out of turn. 2. By consent taken up for hearing at the admission stage itself. 3. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. 4. Petitioner is challenging an order dated 28th July 2021 passed by Respondent No.1, i.e., Joint Commissioner of State Tax (Appeals) by which Respondent No.1 has rejected the refund claim of petitioner amounting to Rs. 1,77,495/-. The refund claim has been rejected on the sole ground of non-compliance of the time ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DEEPAK SHARMA vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Aug 12, 2024)

GURBIR SINGH , J . : 1. Prayer in this petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.30 dated 15.02.2024, under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, 1860, registered at Police Station Mandi Gobindgarh, District Fatehgarh Sahib. 2. The instant case was registered on the complaint of one Pardeep Kumar Singla – State Tax Officer, Fatehgarh Sahib, which reads as under :- “…..An account was freezed by the Indi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. Issue notice. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents accepts notice. 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the cancellation order dated 15.12.2023 (hereafter the impugned cancellation order), whereby the petitioner’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration was cancelled. 4. The petitioner claims that it owns a hotel – Bloom, 17A/32, WEA Karol Bagh, Central Delhi, New Delhi 110005 – the operati...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 20.01.2022 (hereafter the impugned order), whereby the petitioner’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration was cancelled with retrospective effect. 2. The petitioner was registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the CGST Act) and was assigned the Goods and Services Tax Identification Number (GSTIN) 07AJPPH0815A1ZP. 3. The petitioner was issued a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner in this writ application is seeking to issue a direction and declare section 16 (4) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 as ultra vires, in as much as it seeks to impose a time limit for the availment of Input Tax Credit being violative of Article 14, Article 19(1) (g) and Article 300 A of the Constitution of India and also being violative of the basic structure of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 an...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT 1. The petitioners in these cases are Co-operative Societies. They have approached this Court challenging summons issued to them under Section 70 of the CGST / SGST Acts except in W.P(C)No.28242/2024 where Ext.P1 notice has been produced. It is the case of the petitioners that the principle of mutuality applies and at least till 31.12.2021 they were immune from the levy of GST on account of the application of the principle of mutuality. 2. Reference is in this regard is also ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned proceedings dated 20.07.2023 passed by the 1st respondent. 2. Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that all notices/communications were uploaded by the respondent under the column, viz., "V...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA , J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition to quash impugned order dated 30.12.2023 passed by the Taxation and Excise officer. 2. The Petitioner is a company engaged in the business of animal health products and medicaments, whereby the petitioner is a subsidiary of Elanco Netherlands holding B.V., which is a global leader in animal health dedicated to innovating and delivering products and services to prevent and treat disease in farm ani...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)