^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

CHAUDHARY ASSOCIATES vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PANKAJ BHATIA

Pet. Counsel

Ravindra Gupta

Res. Counsel

C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant	CHAUDHARY ASSOCIATES
Respondent	STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Oct 23, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 250 of 2024
Citation	2024(10) TAXREPLY 11378
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 22.12.2023 whereby an order under Section 73 of the State Goods & Service Tax Act against the petitioner as well as the order dated 30.08.2024 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed as being beyond limitation. 3. Confining his argument, the counsel for the petitioner argues that no date of hearing was fixed nor any hearing granted to the petitioner prior to passing of an order under Section 73 of the State Goods & Service Tax Act. 4. Learned Standing counsel based upon the documents states that a communication sent to the petitioner as against the date of hearing, N.A. was transcribed. 5. Thus, prima facie, from the said communication as well as the from the impugned order, it is evident that no hearing was accorded to the petitioner prior to pass....