Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,922 Results

COMMON ORDER The Writ Petitions are filed challenging the impugned order of assessment dated 30.06.2023 and the consequential order dated 12.09.2023 passed in the rectification petition filed by the petitioner. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacture of paper, paperboard in India with focus on recycled grades and specializes in the manufacture of duplex boards, kraft paper, writing and printing papers. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the order dated 19.06.2023 on the premise that the impugned proceedings is made in violation of principles of natural justice. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a work contractor and has executed works contract for various Government authorities. He is also registered under GST Act and had also filed monthly returns reporting inward and outward supplies in the prescribed GSTR-1 and G...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER 1. The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking therein following reliefs: “(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction for declaring Section 16 (4) of Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Annexure-9) as ultra vires, in as much as it seeks to impose a time limit for availment of Input Tax Credit being violative of Article 14, Article 19 (1) (g) and Article 300A of the Constitution of India and al...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by questioning the order dated 27.12.2023. 2. Mr. Parth S.A. Swaroop Pati, learned senior standing counsel, C.G.S.T had raised the preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the writ petition when the matter was taken up on 02.09.2024, on the ground of availability of the alternative remedy of appeal. 3. However, Mr. Deepak Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER 1. Issue notice. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents accept notice. 3. The petitioner impugns an order dated 28.12.2023, passed under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter CGST Act) / Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter DGST Act) in respect of the tax period from July, 2017 to March 2018. The said order was passed pursuant to a Show Cause Notice dated 14.01.2021 (hereafter the impugned SCN). The petitioner was called upon ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 24.07.2023 on the ground that order is passed in violation of principles of natural justice. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had provided man power supply to various private entities in and around Karur District and the petitioner was a registered tax payer under GST Act. It is stated that the petitioner had closed his business since 2021 and GSTIN registratio...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that directions be issued to the respondents to refund a sum of ₹1,01,87,544/- which, the petitioner claims, was deposited under coercion and protest. 2. It is the petitioner’s case that the petitioner had received the summons dated 04.11.2023 under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the CGST Act) and called upon the petitioner to appear before the c...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. At the outset, the learned counsel for petitioner seeks to delete the respondent Nos.4 to 6 from the array of respondents. The same is permitted at the risk and consequences of the petitioner. The deletion be carried out forthwith. 2. The petition questions the orders dated 24.07.2024 (page Nos. 69, 70 and 72), whereby in exercise of powers under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, orders of provisional attachment of the petitioner have been passed by ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GLOBAL TABACC LEGACY vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Bombay High Court | Sep 5, 2024)

ORDER 1. At the outset, the learned counsel for petitioner seeks to delete the respondent No.4 from the array of respondents. The same is permitted at the risk and consequences of the petitioner. The deletion be carried out forthwith. 2. The petition questions the order dated 24.07.2024 (page 61), whereby in exercise of powers under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, order of provisional attachment of the petitioner has been passed by the respondent No.2. Mr. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader (Taxes) appearing for the first respondent. 2. This writ petition has been filed to quash the assessment order dated 27.04.2024, issued under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017, for the assessment year 2018-19. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the first respondent issued a show cause notice in FORM GST DRC-01, dated 23.12.2013, to which, the petitioner filed its rep...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)