Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,922 Results

JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court, being aggrieved by the fact that Ext,P8 application filed by the petitioner for refund of certain amounts paid erroneously as tax has been rejected by Ext.P11 order on untenable grounds. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that in the month of January- 2024, the petitioner had issued two invoices for a total value of Rs.42,27,999.63 and the tax liability of Rs.3,80,519.96 as CGST and Rs.3,80,519.86 as SGST was declared in GSTR-I, the same...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 09.03.2024 (hereafter the impugned order) passed under Section 73 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the IGST Act), the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the CGST Act) and the State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the SGST Act) for the tax period from April 2018 to March 2019. 2. It is the petitioner’s case that the said order ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking to quash the order passed under Section 73 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 / Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, along with the summary of the order in Form GST DRC-07, dated 24.04.2024, issued by the respondent for the financial year 2018-2019. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the financial year 2018-19, the petitioner filed monthly returns in Form GSTR-3B, disclosing an outward supp...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER: JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI Shri R.D. Padraha - Government Advocate accepts the notice on behalf of the respondents. Instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging the adjudication order in form GST DRC-07 having reference no. ZD2305240126613W dated 17/05/2024 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Balaghat, District Chhindwara Division, Jabalpur Zone, Madhya Pradesh by which a demand for excess availment...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that directions be issued to the respondents to release the sum of ₹27,00,000/- which was seized pursuant to a Seizure Memo dated 17.04.2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to a copy of panchnama dated 17.04.2023, which has been annexed along with the counter affidavit filed by the respondents. The same records that the sum of ₹27,00,000/- in cash was found at the office premises of the pe...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. Issue notice. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents accepts notice. 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition being aggrieved by the cancellation of its Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration in terms of the order dated 05.04.2021 (hereafter the impugned cancellation order). The impugned cancellation order was issued pursuant to the Show Cause Notice dated 26.03.2021 (hereafter the SCN). 4. The only reason set out in the SCN reads as u...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. Issue notice. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice. 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a Show Cause Notice dated 05.03.2024 (hereafter the impugned SCN) whereby the petitioner was called upon to show cause why its GST registration not be cancelled. The petitioner also impugns an order dated 02.04.2024 (hereafter the impugned cancellation order), cancelling the petitioner’s GST registration pu...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 14.12.2023 passed by the respondent No. 2 under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for the Tax Period-July 2017-March 2018. 2. We have heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 3. The factual matrix is such that the matter is squarely covered by a coordinate Bench judgment of this Court in Mahaveer Tr...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel, who appears for the State-opposite parties. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order dated 15.03.2024 (Annexure No.1) passed by respondent no.3. ii. Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JINDAL STONE WORKS vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND & OTHERS


(Jharkhand High Court | Sep 5, 2024)

ORDER Per Sujit Narayan Prasad, A.C.J. 1. This petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the following reliefs:- (i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction, including Writ of Certiorari, for quashing/setting aside the Notice contained in Form of GST ASMT 10 bearing Reference No. ZD 200424000271E dated 02.04.2024 (Annexure-1) issued by Respondent in alleged exercise of power under Section 61 of the Jharkhand Goods and...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)