Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

JUDGMENT This writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P1 order issued under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax/State Goods and Services Tax Acts, 2017 (CGST/SGST Acts) for the period between April, 2018 and March, 2019. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the first scrutiny assessment notice issued to the petitioner is Ext.P3. It is submitted that after the petitioner filed Ext.P4 reply, a further scrutiny notice was issued to the p...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER 1. We dispose of this Special Leave Petition by reserving liberty to the petitioner herein to file a review petition before the High Court bringing to the notice of the High Court, the documents which were filed and on record before the High Court and also by bringing on record additional documents. Till such time, the review petition is not disposed of by the High Court, the impugned judgment shall not be cited as a precedent. 2. In the event, the petitioner is unsuccessful...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order passed by the first respondent dated 16.08.2024 on the premise that the impugned order of assessment traverses beyond the show cause notice and also made without granting the petitioner an opportunity to place on record the documentary evidence in support of their objections/submissions/reply. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a partnership concern, engaged in sale...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the Respondent to process the refund application filed vide ARN AA331017993212E dated 22.02.2018 and sanction the refund along with interest. 2. Ms.Revathi Manivannan, learned Senior Standing Counsel takes notice on behalf of the Respondent. 3. By consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 4. The petitioner concern is engaged in the business of civil contracting...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The learned counsel for the Petitioners has only pressed for relief in terms of prayer clause (a) of this Petition, which reads as follows:- “a) that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records pertaining to the Petitioner case and after going into the validity ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL JUDGMENT   (PER M.S. SONAK J.) :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. The rule is made returnable immediately at the request and consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 3. On instructions, Mr Raichandani, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the relief in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c) will not be pressed at this stage and in this petition. Accordingly, we leave the issue of the constitutional validity of Section 16 (2) (c) of t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Anand Nainavati for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms. Shrunjal Shah for the respondent. 2. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned AGP Ms. Shrunjal Shah waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent State. 3. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “a) That Your Lordsh...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT These writ petitions are filed challenging the validity of Rule 96 (10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'CGST Rules') primarily on the ground that the Rule is ultra vires the provisions of Section 16 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IGST Act’). It is not necessary for the purposes of disposal of these writ petitions to refer to the facts of individual cases exc...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court, challenging Ext.P3 order issued under the provisions of Section 74 of the CGST/SGST Acts. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that certain amounts of input tax credit, which was availed by the petitioner in respect of supplies where the tax has already been discharged by the respective suppliers, has not been considered by the 1st respondent while passing Ext.P3 order. It is pointed out that though these details were s...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court, challenging Ext.P2 order issued under the provisions of Section 74 of the CGST/SGST Acts. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that certain amounts of input tax credit, which was availed by the petitioner in respect of supplies where the tax has already been discharged by the respective suppliers, has not been considered by the 1st respondent while passing Ext.P2 order. It is pointed out that though these details were s...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)