Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ORDER This Writ Petition is filed to call for the records on the file of the respondent in its impugned proceedings of the respondent order for the Assessment year 2018-19 IN GSTIN : 33AHYPT2121Q1ZM / 2018-19 dated 08.03.2024 and the consequential DRC-07 order bearing Ref No.: ZD330324052233X dated 11.03.2024 and quash the same. 2. Mr. T.N.C.Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent of both the parties, the main writ petition ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SANJAY DHINGRA vs. STATE OF U.P.


(Allahabad High Court | Oct 15, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. 1. These bail applications arises out of three first information reports, which are: (i) FIR/Case Crime No. 248 of 2023, dated 01.06.2023, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC, Police Station Noida Sector-20, District Gautam Buddh Nagar (ii) FIR /Case Crime No. 203 of 2023, dated 04.05.2023, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC, Police Station Noida Sector-20, District Gautam Buddh Nagar and (iii) FIR/Case Crime No.255 of 202...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER: JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA Heard on the question of admission and interim relief. 2. Petitioner has filed this present petition challenging the validity of show-cause notice No. 22/DGGI/RUI/JD/GST/2023-24 dated 11.7.2023 issued by the respondent. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the petitioner is engaged in construction of building and rental "Rental or leasing services involving own or leased non-residential property". The petitioner is having GST Regist...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 21.01.2022 whereby an order was passed against the petitioner in purported exercise of power under Section 73 of GST Act as well as the order dated 14.03.2024 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed as being beyond limitation. 3. The contention of the Counsel for the petitioner is t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL JUDGMENT  (PER MS SONAK J) :- 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. The Rule is made immediately at the request of and the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties. 3. The Petitioner questions the order in Appeal dated 30 September 2022 by the Additional Commissioner Apples, rejecting the Petitioner’s challenge to the order dated 7 January 2021 (2022) made by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax and Central Excise. By the...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AHS STEELS vs. COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAXES AND ANOTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Oct 15, 2024)

ORDER 1. Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Nimai Das, Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated December 26, 2023 passed by the respondent No.2/Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Sector-17, Ghaziabad under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "the Ac...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HINDUSTAN ENTERPRISES vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Oct 15, 2024)

ORDER 1. Heard Sri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Nimai Das, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 26.8.2024 passed by the respondent No.2 under Section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 3. The factual matrix is such that the matter is squarely covered b...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BHANSALI INDUSTRIES vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Bombay High Court | Oct 15, 2024)

ORAL JUDGMENT   (PER M. S. SONAK, J.) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. The Rule is made returnable immediately at the request and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 3. The Petitioner challenges the following:- (i) The adjudication order dated 03 July 2023 made by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Pune (Respondent No. 4); and (ii) The order dated 06 July 2022 blocking the Petitioner's credit ledger. 4. The challen...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER 1. Delay condoned. 2. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The Special Leave Petition is hence dismissed. 3. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER With consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order passed by the first respondent dated 29.04.2024 directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 19,63,238/- as tax and Rs. 18,15,960/- towards interest and Rs. 1,96,322/- towards penalty, totaling to Rs. 39,75,520/- and consequently, to direct the respondents 2, 3 and 4 to de-freeze the petitioner's Bank Accounts. 3. M/...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)