Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,115 Results

Heard Shri Shubham Agrawal along with Shri Lokesh Mittal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri C.B.Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the department. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to challenge the seizure order dated 16.11.2017 passed by the respondent no.4, Assistant Commissioner, State Tax/State Tax Authority, Mobile Squad-10, Agra under Section 129(1) of the U.P. GST Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act) and the penalty order dated 23.11.2017 pa...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to challenge the order dated 28.10.2017 passed under Section 129(1) U.P. GST Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and the penalty order dated 31.10.2017 passed under Section 129(3) of the Act. The petitioner claims to to transporting 'Panmasala' from Delhi to Dumka, Jharkhand. The goods were passing through State of U.P. being a transit State. On 27.10.2017 the goods were detained. At that stage only one reason was ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard Shri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri C.B. Tripathi , learned Standing Counsel for the department. This writ petition has been filed by the consignor of the goods to challenge the order dated 03.11.2017 passed by the respondent no.4, Assistant Commissioner, U.P. Goods & Services Tax, Mobile Squad-II, Gorakhpur, under Section 129(1) of the U.P. GST Act(hereinafter referred to as the 'Act) and the order dated 08.11.2017 passed under Sectio...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard both. 2. The petitioner rushed to this Court expressing a difficulty in filing e-returns, as there was a problem in the portal. 3. The reason for approaching this Court was on the ground that if the petitioner is unable to access the portal and file their returns, the respondent Department will levy penalty under Section 47 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. This submission was recorded by this Court on 20.11.2017 and the learned Senior Panel Counsel ap...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
A consignment of ready made textile goods that was being transported at the instance of the petitioner was detained by the respondents. Ext.P6 is the detention notice. In the writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the insistence of the respondents that the petitioner must pay the security deposit demanded in the detention notice as a condition for release of the goods and vehicle. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the learned Government Plead...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.G.M.Syed Nurullah Sheriff, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. With the consent on either side, the writ petition itself is taken up for disposal. 2. The petitioner is before this Court challenging an order-in-original dated 07.11.2017 passed in respect of an import made by the petitioner vide Bill of entry No.3450978 dated 03.10.2017 for clearance of imported goods declared as GS...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner the consignor of certain goods has approached this Court against the notice issued by the detaining authority under the CGST/SGST Act. After detention when verification was made, it was found that there was misclassification as also under valuation. The mis-classification was in so far as the goods being described as falling under HSN Code 4601 as per the invoice. On verification of the goods transported, it was seen that it could only fall under HSN Code 3926. There was a rate...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER By this writ petition in the nature of public interest litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging imposition of GST on the confectionery items on the ground that it does not come within the purview of taxes at the rate of 18% to 28%, as imposed by the respondents. 2. Under the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017, specific provision is there to raise objection before the Council or Commissioner, GST, and this Court is not an Expert B...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This Writ Petition is filed inter alia for the relief of declaring the seizure of the petitioner’s vehicle bearing registration No.KA 01 AE 1227 by respondent No.1 as illegal. The consequential relief of direction to the respondents for release of the said vehicle to the petitioner has also been claimed We have heard Mr. G.Narendra Chetty, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shaik Jeelani Basha, learned Special Standing Counsel for Commercial Taxes (Andhra Pradesh). The a...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. As jointly agreed by the respective parties, the present writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage itself. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order of seizure dated 07.11.2017 passed by respondent no.4 under Section 129(1) of the U.P. GST Act, 2017 and consequential notice No.505 dated 07.11.2017 issued by the respondent no.4, under Section 129(3)...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


12
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
13 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o Apr 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).