Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

RAJAGURU SPINNING MILLS PVT. LTD. vs. THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK, EAST WING, THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER, O/O. THE PRINCIPAL COMMERCIAL OF GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE, THE COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, THE COMMISSIONER, GST & CENTRAL EXCISE, THE JOINT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXESTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, GST & CENTRAL EXCISE, THE SUPERINTENDENT, GST & CENTRAL EXCISE, ERODE-II DIVISION, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Pet. Counsel
K.elango
Res. Counsel
.v.sundareswaran

Petitioner / Applicant

RAJAGURU SPINNING MILLS PVT. LTD.

Respondent THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK, EAST WING, THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER, O/O. THE PRINCIPAL COMMERCIAL OF GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE, THE COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, THE COMMISSIONER, GST & CENTRAL EXCISE, THE JOINT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXESTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, GST & CENTRAL EXCISE, THE SUPERINTENDENT, GST & CENTRAL EXCISE, ERODE-II DIVISION, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES
Court Madras High Court
State

Tamilnadu

Date Nov 24, 2017
Order No.

Writ Petition No.29671 of 2017 & WMP.No.31984 of 2017

Citation

2017(11) TAXREPLY 3127

Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

ORDER Heard both. 2. The petitioner rushed to this Court expressing a difficulty in filing e-returns, as there was a problem in the portal. 3. The reason for approaching this Court was on the ground that if the petitioner is unable to access the portal and file their returns, the respondent Department will levy penalty under Section 47 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. This submission was recorded by this Court on 20.11.2017 and the learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the respondents was directed to take instructions in the matter. 4. Today, it is reported that the difficulty in the portal has been rectified on 21.11.2017 and the petitioner also affirms that they are able to access the portal. 5. The learned Senior Panel Counsel would submit that the respondent Department waived the penalty fee for the months of July, August and September 2017 and that the petitioner can access the portal, file their returns for October 2017 and pay the ta....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)