Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ORDER Heard Shri Shubham Agrawal assisted by Miss Sanyukta Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri C.B. Tripathi, learned Special Counsel representing the respondents. By means of the present writ petition the petitioners have sought the following relief : "(a) Issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the seizure order dated 25.9.2017 (Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition) as well as the consequential notice dated 26.9.2017 (Annexure No...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the respondents to notify an authority for advance ruling as contemplated under Section 96 of the Kerala State Goods and Service Tax Ordinance, 2017. The apprehension of the petitioner in the writ petition is essentially that, although the statutory provisions contemplate an authority for advance rulings within the State, the respondents have not constituted the authority, and hence, the petitioner is not able to approach an auth...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Shri R.C. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents no. 5 and 6 as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents no. 1 to 4. The petitioner is a partnership firm and had applied for registration under GST on 27.6.2017, but mistakenly provided the PAN number of one of the partner of the firm. When the mistake was realized, the petitioner then again applied for registration on 14.8.2017 for registration. This time giving the...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1.0. Rule. Shri Dhaval Nanavati, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent no.1 and Shri Mahavir Gadhvi, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent no.2. In the facts and circumstance of the case and with the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties, present petition is taken up for final hearing today. 2.0. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed f...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PON PURE CHEMICAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Oct 30, 2017)

The application for advance ruling of M/s. Pon Pure Chemical India Pvt. Ltd. was heard on 17.10.2017 on the issue as to whether the application is fit for admission or not. Shri Shivrajan Kalyanaraman was requested on that day to submit the reasons / provisions on following issues by 23/25.10.2017. (i) Whether the authority is within jurisdiction to admit application especially on the issue of ‘place of supply’? (ii) Whether the issue is related to Customs or is related to...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner is aggrieved with the detention of goods at Exhibit P4. The goods are granite purchased by the petitioner from Tamil Nadu and transported to Karamana at Thiruvananthapuram. The petitioner submits that the transport is effected for the purpose of building a residential house; the permit of which is produced at Exhibit P1 and the plan at Exhibit P2. The detention, as is seen from Exhibit P4, was for the reason that the notice issued is that of the Value Added Tax period and also ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
A consignment of M.S scrap, that was being transported at the instance of the petitioner, was detained by the respondents. Ext.P3 is the detention notice issued to the petitioner. In the writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the insistence of the respondent that the petitioner must pay the security deposit demanded in the detention notice as a condition for release of the goods and vehicle. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the learned Gover...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
A consignment of motor vehicle chasis that was being stock transferred at the instance of the petitioner was detained by the respondent. Ext.P3 is the detention notice issued to the petitioner. In the writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the insistence of the respondent that the petitioner must pay the security deposit demanded in the detention notice as a condition for release of the goods and the vehicle. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Exts.P4 and P6 detention notices that have been issued detaining a consignment of goods that was being transported at the instance of the petitioner. On a perusal of Exts.P4 and P6 notices, it is seen that, out of four consignments, three consignments were detained, on the ground that, the goods which were stated to be transported pursuant to an interstate sale were not accompanied by valid documents as prescribed under the State Goods and...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard Sri Rahul Agarwal assisted by Sri Varad Nath and Miss. Archi Agarwal learned counsels for the petitioner. Sri V.K.S. Raghuvanshi, appeared for the respondent no.4, Sri C.B. Tripathi for the respondent nos.1 and 5 and Sri Arvind Kumar Kushwaha holding the brief of Sri Prem Shankar Prasad, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 6. With the consent of the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respective parties, the present writ petition is disposed of finally wi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)