Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

AQUA MACHINERIES PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jan 17, 2018)

The applicant, M/s. Aqua Machineries (Pvt.) Ltd. manufactures and supplies Power Driven Pumps (falling under Chapter Heading 8413), which are primarily designed for handling water, which is of either clear or raw or storm or waste or sewerage. The said pumps are not fitted with measuring device. As the different items falling under Chapter Heading 8413 attract different rates viz. 5%, 12% or 28% under Goods and Services Tax, the applicant has raised the following questions for advance ruling ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

R.B. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jan 17, 2018)

The applicant submitted that they had bid in a tender issued by the Rajkot Municipal Corporation (RMC) to supply pipes, lay the pipes in desired formation as planned by the Government and to test the pipes against the leakages and then commission the project. The work to be executed as per the tender was to construct a pipeline network as per the specifications and design of the RMC. The release of the payment of the applicant fixed by the RMC is as follows :- Sr. No...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Ms. Sandhya Natani, learned advocate for the petitioner, under instructions, states that the cause stated in the petition no longer survives. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
We have heard Shri J.P. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri C.B. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. The petitioner has sought a writ of certiorari to quash the seizure order dated 03.01.2018 passed by the respondent nos.3 and 4. From the record it appears that the E-Way Bill, which has been appended to the petition, it is clear that the E-Way Bill itself was downloaded on 07.01.2017 i.e. four days after the seizure has been made. The penalty order has a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
We have heard Shri M.M. Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri C.B. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. Learned Standing Counsel has received instruction that no penalty order has been passed against the petitioner. The petitioner has sought to quash the seizure order dated 05.01.2018 which has been passed against the petitioner on the allegation that there was some wrong declaration on the date in the E-way Bill. The petitioner states that it had been written...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioner seeks release of the goods detained by the respondent under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act as also the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act. 2. It is seen that an identical matter has been disposed of by a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.1802 of 2017, directing expeditious completion of the adjudication of the matter and permitting release of the goods detained pending adjudication, in terms of Rule 140(1) of the Kerala Goods and Services Tax Ru...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Shri Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri C.B. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to challenge the seizure order dated 30.12.2017 passed under Section 129(1) of U.P. GST Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). The petitioner was carrying 440 quintals of Poplar woods in Vehicle No.U.P.-22-T-9786. The goods are tax paid goods. The E-Way Bill has been produced before us and the...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Sri Suyash Agarwal, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Manish Goyal, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the notice dated 22.11.2017 issued u/s 129(3) of UPGST Act as well as order dated 30.11.2017 passed u/s 129 (3) of the Act by which the respondent no.4 has directed the petitioner to deposit the penalty in excess ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Shri R.R. Kapoor, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri C.B. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to challenge the seizure order dated 16.12.2017 passed under Section 129(1) U.P. GST Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') as well as the consequential notice dated 16.12.2017 passed under Section 129(3) of the Act. The ground for making seizure of goods is that the E-Way Bill had not been downl...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner seems to have been aggrieved by the improper implementation of Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, which were passed during the year 2017. 3. The writ petition was entertained on 28. 08. 2017 and the learned Additional Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the fifth respondent, has undertaken to file counter-affidavit. 4. When the matte...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)