Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

NAGPUR INTEGRATED TOWNSHIP PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 2, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by M/s. Nagpur Integrated Township Private Limited the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The challenge is to the order dated 11.03.2019 at Annexure-H purported to have been made under Section 129 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 which, in substance, provides for detention and seizure of the transport vehicle to coerce recovery of tax and penalty in certain circumstances. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate, Smt. Veena Hegde and Sri. Anilkumar Biradar, Commercial Tax Officer (Enforcement) 5, Belagavi – respondent No.2 herein, who is prese...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NIKUNJ STEEL vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Apr 1, 2019)

1. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to release the goods along with Truck No. PB-13- BA-1808 as per the provisions of Sections 129(1)(a) and 130 of the Punjab Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (in short “the Act”) and as per order dated 13.3.2019 (Annexure P-8). 2. The petitioner is in the business of trading of iron scrap from the State of Punjab and...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Heard Sri Rishi Raj Kapoor, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri B.K. Singh Raghuvanshi, learned counsel for the respondent no.5 and Sri Krishna Ji Shukla, learned counsel for the Union of India. 2. The petitioner by means of this petition wants time to file GST TRAN-I be extended or that recommendations be made to the GST Council to extend the period of limitation for the above purpose. The petitioner apart from the above prayer has not pressed any other relief. 3. In...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Sri. S. Anil Kumar the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. C. K Govindan the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner confined his prayers to the following reliefs: “(i) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or orders directing the 2nd Respondent to rerun the original of the records covered by Ext. P2 recovered at the time of inspection on 30-08-2014 to the petitioner at the...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KHER DIESELS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND 6 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Mar 30, 2019)

ORDER Heard Sri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Shamim Ahmad, learned Counsel for the respondents no.1,2 & 5, Sri R.C. Shukla, learned Counsel for the respondents no.3 & 4 learned Standing Counsel appears for the respondent no.6 & 7. The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the GST council respondent no.2 to make recommendations to the Commissioner to extend the time period for filing of GST Tran-1 in the case of the petitioner because his ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HINDUSTAN COCA-COLA BEVERAGES PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Mar 30, 2019)

The applicant M/s. Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Private Limited is engaged in the manufacture of aerated drinks and fruit pulp or fruit juice based drinks under different brand names, classifying the same under Chapter 22 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. 2. The Applicant commenced manufacturing of a new product “FANTA FRUITY ORANGE” on 10th August, 2017 in its factory located at Village Goblej, Tal. Matar, Dist. Kheda- 387440, Gujarat and made fir...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

UNION OF INDIA vs. INDIA GLYCOLS LIMITED


(Supreme Court | Mar 29, 2019)

ORDER Considering the fact that Special Leave Petition against the relied upon judgment has already been dismissed on 14-12-2018 being SLP (C) Diary No. 40434 of 2018 [2019 (29) G.S.T.L. J72 (S.C.), for the same reasons, this Special Leave Petition must follow the same suit. Accordingly, the Special Leave Petition is disposed of in the same terms. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner in W.P. (C). No.26416 of 2018 is the appellant herein, challenging the judgment dated 25.01.2019 of the Single Judge dismissing the writ petition. The respondents herein are the respondents in the writ petition. 2. Ext.P1 pre-assessment notice was challenged mainly contending that the assessment proposed is barred by the limitation provided under Section 25(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003(KVAT Act). Inter alia, the appellant challenged the validity of Section 174...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioners facing prosecution before the respondents for the alleged offences punishable under Section 132 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017, are seeking anticipatory bail before this Court. 2.The petitioners are husband and wife. There are several entities in the nature of Proprietorship Concerns, Partnership Concerns or Private Limited Companies, in which the petitioners are Proprietor, Partner and Directors and the entities are engaged in the supply of Iron and Steel by ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


18
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).