Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

NITIN NIKHRA vs. STATE OF M.P.


(Madhya Pradesh High Court | Apr 9, 2019)

The applicant has filed this second application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail, who has been arrested and is in custody since 6.2.2019, in connection with Case No.8/18-19, registered at Police Station Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax Department, Gwalior M.P., for the offence punishable under Sections 132 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter would be referred as to the “Act of 2017”) and 467, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Hi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CROWN BEERS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 9, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 101 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act. The present appeal has be...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BANDAI NAMCO INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 8, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by M/s. BANDAI NAMCO INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. Applicable GST Ra...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BAULI INDIA BAKES AND SWEETS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 8, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Bauli India Bakes and Sweets Private Limited, seeking an advance ruling in respect of following questions...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RSPL LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Supreme Court | Apr 5, 2019)

ORDER Delay condoned. The special leave petition is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM APPL. 15943/2019 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3483/2019 & CM APPL. Nos. 15942/2019 2. This writ petition has been filed by the Independent Power Producers Association of India, seeking the following reliefs: “(a) Pass an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the Circular No. 34/8/2018-G8T, dated 01.03.2018 as modified by Circular No. 46/20/2018-GST, dated 06.06.2018 to the extent they seek to levy GST on sale of REC s...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard Sri Aloke Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Devendra Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Sri B.K.S. Raghuvanshi, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 4 to 6. The petitioner submitted FORM GST TRAN-1 on 20.10.2017 within the time prescribed. However, it was noticed that due to some inadvertent mistake, the amount of CENVAT credit admissible as ITC was filled up in the wrong column due to which, the said credit is not being reflected in ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BHAGWAN MOTORS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Apr 4, 2019)

ORDER Heard Sri Rishi Raj Kapoor, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel for the respondent no.5. The petitioner by means of this petition wants time to file GST TRAN-I be extended or that recommendation be made to the GST Council to extend the period of limitation for the above purpose. The petitioner apart from the above prayer has not pressed any other relief. In that con...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner is an Assessee before the respondent authorities, in terms of the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, (in short 'CGST Act'). The CGST Act was implemented with effect from 01.07.2017 and provides for the assessment of turnover from sales and services as enumerated therein. Regular monthly returns have been filed by the petitioner and this is not disputed. 2. While this was so, there appears to have been an investigation initiated by ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PARSHWA BUILDERS vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Madhya Pradesh High Court | Apr 4, 2019)

ORDER The petitioner before this Court has filed present petition stating that the respondents have failed to allow the rectification of error on GST Portal despite multiple representations. 02-The petitioner's contention is that the petitioner has submitted its TRAN-1 on the online GST Portal and after uploading the same he has noticed that by mistake he has not claimed credit of State Tax of ₹ 5,73,510/- as reflected in the Value Added Tax Return. The petitioner has made an at...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


19
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).