Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

BILCARE LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 26, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. BILCARE LIMITED, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. Determining whether t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

THE LEPROSY MISSION TRUST OF INDIA


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 26, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by THE LEPROSY MISSION TRUST OF INDIA, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. Whether s...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

UMBERTO CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.


(First Appellate Authority, Ahmedabad | Apr 25, 2019)

M/s. Umberto Ceramics International Private Limited, Sadolia, Prantij (henceforth, “appellant”) has filed the present appeal against the Order-in-Original No. 11/Ref/CGST/AC/HMT/2018-19, dated 12-12-2018 (henceforth, “impugned order”) issued by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST, Division-Himatnagar, Gandhinagar (henceforth, -, “adjudicating authority”). 2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the appellant, a manufacturer of tableware, kitchenw...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R Learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 7. 2. The petitioner has sought for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent No.7 to enable the petitioner to file its Form GST TRAN-2. 3. The petitioner contends that the attempt made to file Form GST TRAN-2 was unsuccessful due to technical glitches as on 07.03.2018. Since then, several complaints have been made with the respondent-authorities to redress the grievance of the ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R The petitioner has assailed the communication dated 22.03.2019 issued by the respondent No.6 at Annexure-A to the writ petition inter alia seeking a direction to the respondents to enable the petitioner to revise their Form GST TRAN-1 in order to transit the amount of ₹ 4,31,32,066/- in the Electronic Credit Ledger in terms of the provisions of Section 140[1] and Section 140[5] of the Central Goods Service Tax Act, 2017 ['CGST Act' for short] read with Rule 1...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present Report dated 26.09.2018, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The facts of the case are that the Applicant No. 1 vide the minutes of its meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by the Respondent on the supply of “BWP Tr...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DAEWOO-TPL JV


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 24, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as "the CGST Act and MGST Act" respectively] by M/s. DAEWOO-TPLJV, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. 1. The questions / issues befo...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SANOFI INDIA LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 24, 2019)

  PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act respectively”] by M/s. SANOFI INDIA LIMITED, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. Wheth...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AAREL IMPORT EXPORT PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 24, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act “respectively] by M/s. AAREL IMPORT EXPORT PRIVATE LIMITED, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. (i)&...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NIKIT MITTAL vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Jharkhand High Court | Apr 23, 2019)

1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the issuance of warrant of arrest pursuant to issuance of summons. 2. Mr. Kumar Sundaram, learned counsel, for the petitioner, has submitted that in similar facts and circumstances, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 21.02.2019, passed in W.P.(Cr.) No.415 of 2018 and analogous cases, had directed the petitioners to appear before the Senior Intelligence Officer, as and when called for and if summons are issued they sh...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


19
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).