Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

U.P. PAINTS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND 6 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Apr 30, 2019)

Heard Mr. Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ashok Singh, learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the GST council respondent no.2 to make recommendations to the State Government to extend the time period for filing of GST Tran- 1 in the case of the petitioner because his application was not entertained on the last date i.e. 27.12.2017 and he is permitted to file his complete GST TRAN-1 for the necessary transactional ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and, by consent, the matter is heard finally. 2. Heard Dr. Kantawala, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Nankani, learned senior counsel for the respondent No.3. 3. The petitioner claims himself as a public spirited advocate practising in this High Court, and seeks directions to initiate criminal prosecution against the respondent No.3- a Company named “Dream 11 Fantasy Pvt. Ltd.”, firstly for allegedly conducting illegal o...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ROTARY CLUB OF MUMBAI QUEENS NECKLACE


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 30, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Rotary Club of Mumbai Queens Necklace, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1.1. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAMBAGH PALACE HOTELS PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Apr 30, 2019)

The issue raised by M/s Rambagh palace Hotels Pvt. Ltd., Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005 (hereinafter the applicant) is fit to pronounce advance ruling as it falls under the ambit of the Section 97 (2) (a)(d) given as under : a. classification of any goods or services or both; d. admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid; Further, the applicant being a registered person (GSTIN is 08AAACH6899P1ZL as per the declaration given by him in Fo...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. ALLIANCE ONE INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Apr 29, 2019)

ORDER (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/s. Alliance One Industries India Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Mr. D.K. Puj, learned advocate for the petitioner has invited the attention of the court to the invoice at Annexure-A to the petition, to point out that the goods that were being transported were jeera and souff. The attention of the court was invited to the Notification No.27/2017-Central Tax dated 30.8.2017 issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, to point out that the same provides that notwithstanding anything contained in rule 138 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules,...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this application, the applicant seeks review of the judgment and order dated 29.1.2019 passed by this Court in Special Civil Application No.16599 of 2018, whereby the Court had directed the applicants No.1 and 2 herein to forthwith provisionally release the seized goods of the respondent-original petitioner under sub-section (6) of section 67 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 upon the respondent executing a bond in form GST INS-04 for the total value of the seized goods and...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R Learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for the respondents. The petitioner has sought for a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.5 to consider Annexures – G and H dated 16.11.2018 and 04.01.2019 to enable the petitioner to file Form GST TRAN – 2 either on the common portal or manually. 2. The petitioner – Company is engaged in trading and supply of branded clothing and holding a plethora of fashion brands under their aegis. I...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner is a registered dealer on the rolls of the State Tax Officer (WC) State GST Department. The petitioner, being aggrieved by Exhibits- P1, P1A and P1B Assessment Orders for the years 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016- 17, has filed Exhibits- P2, P2A and P2B appeals respectively. There is a delay of 39 days in filing the appeals and therefore, the petitioner has filed Exts P3,P3A and P3B petitions for condonation of delay in the respective appeals. The petitioner has also filed Exts P4,...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. VST INDUSTRIES LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Apr 26, 2019)

ORDER (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017, (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/s. VST Industries Limited, Guntur (hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods &...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


19
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).