Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

RAKESH SHARMA vs. STATE OF HARYANA


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Nov 5, 2024)

KIRTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been invoked for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 0446 dated 15.09.2020 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC (Section 132 CGST Act, 2017 added later on) at Police Station Kundli, District Police Sonipat. 2. The above-mentioned FIR was got registered on the basis of complaint made by Prashant Kadyan, Excise & Taxation Officer-cum-Proper officer (GST), Sonepat. The c...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. This petition has been preferred impugning the order dated 09 July 2024 in terms of which the registration of the writ petitioner under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 CGST Act has come to be cancelled with retrospective effect from 08 October 2022. 2. As we read the impugned Show Cause Notice SCN which had preceded the final order of cancellation, we find the same had alleged a violation of Section 29 (2)(e) of the CGST Act with it being asserted that the regist...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following. 1. We are not inclined to entertain the Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. 2. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed. 3. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

J.S.B. TRADING CO. vs. STATE OF PUNJAB


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Nov 4, 2024)

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner – firm is stated to be dealing in the business of sale and purchase of iron scrap. It claimed purchases amounting to sum of Rs. 49,45,578/- from M/s RP Metals and M/s Amarinder Singh. 2. A notice dated 05.09.2022 under Section 61 of Punjab GST/CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') was issued for scrutiny of the return by the Proper Officer to explain about the ITC claimed on the purchases, alleging that d...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 09.01.2024 on the limited ground that the impugned order has been made on a gross non-application of mind to the objections filed by the petitioner. 2. During the assessment year 2021-2022, the petitioner had registered under GST Act and filed his return for the year 2021-2022 and claims that he had also paid appropriate taxes. The challenge to the impugned order is on the premise that the petitioner's c...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

UBER INDIA SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Nov 4, 2024)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98 (4) OF THE CGST ACT, 2017 & UNDER SECTION 98 (4) OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 M/s. Uber India Systems Private Limited (herein after referred to as ‘Applicant’), 2nd Floor, 77, Survey No. 124/2, Prabhas Legacy, Murugeshpalya, H.A.L. Post, N.A.L. Wind tunnel Road, Bengaluru 560 017, having GSTIN 29AABCU6223H2Z9, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of KGST Act, 20...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

COMPUCOM SOFTWARE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Rajasthan High Court | Nov 4, 2024)

ORDER AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (ORAL):- 1. These petitions are decided by this common order as the issue and facts involved are similar. For convenience, the facts are being taken from DBCWP No. 7525/2021. 2. This petition was filed challenging vires of Section 17 (5) (c) & (d) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘CGST Act’). 3. The issue raised in this petition is no longer res integra and is covered by the decision of Supreme Court in Chief C...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

LAKHWINDER SINGH STONE CRUSHER vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Himachal Pradesh High Court | Nov 4, 2024)

JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed for grant of following substantive reliefs: i. Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the Notification No. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 (Annexure P-5), Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 (Annexure P-6), Himachal Pradesh Govt. Notification No. 11/2017 dated 30.06.2017 (Annexure P-7), Himachal Pradesh Govt. Notification No. 1/2017 dated 30....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MATRI STONE CRUSHER & OTHERS vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Himachal Pradesh High Court | Nov 4, 2024)

JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed for grant of following substantive reliefs: i. Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 (Annexure P-3), Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 (Annexure P-4), Himachal Pradesh Govt. Notification No. 11/2017 dated 30.06.2017 (Annexure P-5), Himachal Pradesh Govt. Notification No. 1/2017 dated 30....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

EDEN STEEL ALLOYS vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Nov 4, 2024)

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(ORAL) 1. The present order shall dispose of aforementioned twenty-two writ petitions as common question of law is involved in all the writ petitions. 2. The issue in the present writ petitions is no more res integra. Although, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the orders have been passed without jurisdiction and this aspect be again examined, we refrain from doing so. The petitioner while filing the present writ petitions relies on the notic...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)