Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

Mr. Tushar Hemani, learned advocate with Mr. Apurva Mehta and Mr. Vijay Patel, learned advocates for the petitioner has invited the attention of the court to an order dated 9.2.2018 passed by this court in Special Civil Application No.726/2018, wherein, similar question of facts and law are involved and this Court had issued notice. Under the circumstances, issue Notice, returnable on 19.6.2019. By way of ad interim relief, the impugned order dated 27.4.2019 (AnnexureD to the pet...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KRUSHNA NAVGHAN KARAVADRA vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | May 9, 2019)

1. Rule. Mr. Utkarsh Sharma waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents. Having regard to the controversy involved in this case, which lies in a very narrow compass, the matter was taken up for final hearing today. 2. By this petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged a letter dated 11.3.2019 (AnnexureA to the petition) issued by the second respondent – State Tax Officer continuing the instructions of restraining transfer...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BEENA MEDICAL AGENCIES vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | May 9, 2019)

1. Mr. Tushar Hemani, learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that vide order dated 6.3.2019, the first appellate authority has allowed the appeal filed by the petitioner against cancellation of its registration and has directed the second respondent to restore registration number being Registration No.24AACFB8930AIZO after due verification. It was submitted that however, the order passed by the first appellate authority is not being complied with. 2. This court has also heard Mr. S...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Heard Mr. Paresh Dave, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Kamal Trivedi, learned Advocate General for the respondents. 2. Having regard to the submissions advanced by the learned advocates for the respective parties, by way of an interim measure, the respondents are directed to release the detained goods together with the conveyance, subject to the petitioner paying the tax and penalty as computed by the respondent authorities and also subject to filing a solemn undertaking be...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KRISHNA AUTOMOBILES vs. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | May 9, 2019)

ORDER Heard Sri Aditya Pandey learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Vaibhav Tripathi, who appears for respondent no.1 to 3 and learned standing counsel for the State respondents. The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the GST council respondent no.2 to make recommendations to the State Government to extend the time period for filing of GST Tran-2 in the case of the petitioner because his application was not entertained on the last date i.e. 30.6.2018 and he is permitted t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Heard Mr. D.K. Trivedi, learned advocate for the petitioners and Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. In this case, the petitioners have already paid the amounts of tax and penalty as computed by the respondents. Under the circumstances, the respondents shall release the detained goods as well as the conveyance, subject to each of the petitioners filing a solemn undertaking before this court to the effect that the petitioners shall make good ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

A RAYMOND FASTENERS INDIA PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | May 9, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. A Raymond Fasteners India Pvt. Ltd, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the follo...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SANIKA DEVELOPERS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | May 9, 2019)

M/s Sanika Developers, Arjun Empire, S-201, 2nd Floor, Congress Road, Tilakwadi, Belagavi, Karnataka-590006, (herein after referred to as ‘Applicant’) having GSTIN number 29ABKFS7231G1ZV, have filed an application, on 04-01-2019, for advance ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 & KGST Act, 2017 read with rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in form GST ARA-01. They also enclosed copies of challans for ₹ 10,000/- (CGST of ₹ 5,000/- paid vide CIN SBIN19012...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HOTEL LEELA VENTURE LIMITED,


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | May 9, 2019)

M/s. Hotel Leela Venture Limited, # 23, Old Airport Road, Kodihalli, Bengaluru, Karnataka-560008, (herein after referred to as ‘Applicant’) having GSTIN number 29AAACH3167J1ZE, have filed an application, on 06-05-2019, for advance ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 & KGST Act, 2017 read with rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in form GST ARA-01. They also enclosed copy of challan for ₹ 10,000/- (CGST of ₹ 5,000/ & KGST of ₹ 5,000/-) bearing CIN...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner is aggrieved by the orders dated 25.02.2019 and 28.02.2019, passed by the respondent No.2. By the first order, the petitioner was requested to workout the interest payable on the entire amount inclusive of the ITC availed, and also penalty payable under Section 122(iii) of the Goods and Services Act (‘the Act’, for short). By the latter order, the petitioner was directed to pay the interest, failing which, the recovery proceedings would be initiated under Section 79...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


20
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).